2020
DOI: 10.26451/abc.07.02.07.2020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Call combinations in great apes and the evolution of syntax

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
24
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
24
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…An emphasis on combinations and codes is, moreover, sometimes linked with particular assumptions about evolution: that as complex systems of words, rules and combinations, natural languages are enrichments of the communication systems of other species (e.g. Nowak et al, 2000;Progovac, 2015;Leroux & Townsend, 2020;Planer & Sterelny, 2021). This picture is attractive because it describes human and non-human communication systems in terms that appear continuous.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An emphasis on combinations and codes is, moreover, sometimes linked with particular assumptions about evolution: that as complex systems of words, rules and combinations, natural languages are enrichments of the communication systems of other species (e.g. Nowak et al, 2000;Progovac, 2015;Leroux & Townsend, 2020;Planer & Sterelny, 2021). This picture is attractive because it describes human and non-human communication systems in terms that appear continuous.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being non-human primates our closest living relatives, their vocal communication systems have often been regarded as the best model to understand which selective pressures lead to the uniqueness of human language (Fedurek and Slocombe 2011). Indeed, different crucial aspects underlying human vocal behavior shape the acoustic communication systems of other primates (Leroux and Townsend 2020). For example, previous studies investigated the ability to combine single components into larger structures and their referentiality (Pan troglodytes: Slocombe and Zuberbühler 2005; Pan paniscus: Clay and Zuberbühler 2009; Cercopithecus campbelli: Ouattara et al 2009; Callicebus nigrifrons: Cäsar and Zuberbühler 2012), the turntaking among individuals (Indri indri: Gamba et al 2016;Ateles geoffroyi: Briseño-Jaramillo et al 2018; Macaca fuscata: Katsu et al 2019), and the presence of rhythmic patterns (Indri indri: Gamba et al 2016;De Gregorio et al 2019; Tarsius spectrum gurskyae: Clink et al 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, there are currently no explicit indications in the literature to my knowledge that specifically wild apes ( Hominoidea ) might be capable of semantic compositionality (cf. Boesch and Crockford 2005 ; Leroux and Townsend 2020 ; Terrace et al 1979 ). This is somewhat unexpected given that language experiments with captive apes have clearly demonstrated that they possess the capacity for at least some degree of semantic compositionality in both language production and language reception.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%