2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.cose.2013.07.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Caller-REP: Detecting unwanted calls with caller social strength

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Balasubramaniyan et al propose to use call duration as a measure to generate a reputation score called CallRank . Similarly, Azad and Morola use call rate, call duration and out‐degree distributions of a caller to set a reputation threshold for spammer detection.…”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Balasubramaniyan et al propose to use call duration as a measure to generate a reputation score called CallRank . Similarly, Azad and Morola use call rate, call duration and out‐degree distributions of a caller to set a reputation threshold for spammer detection.…”
Section: Prior Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Azad et al vary R SPITters = 10%, 20% and 30% in Ref. [11] while Chaisamran et al vary R SPITters from 1% to 10% in Ref. [29].…”
Section: Classification Accuracy Versus R Spittersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is a similar setting to Ref. [11] which considers 25% of all callers as SPITters. It seems to excessive to consider the cost to obtain SIP addresses.…”
Section: Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In particular, a social trust-based approach is receiving much attention due to growing SNS-based voice communication services. A social trust-based approach judges the legitimacy of a call with a trust value calculated from caller-callee relationships [2,3,4,5]. We especially pay attention to the scheme [5] since it can correctly classify unknown users.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%