2018
DOI: 10.1002/rcm.8044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calling all archaeologists: guidelines for terminology, methodology, data handling, and reporting when undertaking and reviewing stable isotope applications in archaeology

Abstract: Stable isotope analysis has been utilized in archaeology since the 1970s, yet standardized protocols for terminology, sampling, pretreatment evaluation, calibration, quality assurance and control, data presentation, and graphical or statistical treatment still remain lacking in archaeological applications. Here, we present recommendations and requirements for each of these in the archaeological context of: bulk stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis of organics; bulk stable carbon and oxygen isotope analy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
55
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 82 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
0
55
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Details on data handling should be fully reported with each published isotope data set. Some guidelines on reporting isotope data are available for archaeology (Szpak et al 2017;Roberts et al 2018) and forensics (Dunn et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Details on data handling should be fully reported with each published isotope data set. Some guidelines on reporting isotope data are available for archaeology (Szpak et al 2017;Roberts et al 2018) and forensics (Dunn et al 2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, differences in CSIA methodology (e.g. derivatization protocol) can produce measurement discrepancies which are difficult to control for, given the scarcity of pairwise inter‐laboratory comparisons (Roberts et al, ). We checked that our results are robust to potential inter‐laboratory measurement discrepancies using two separate tests.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, the δ value for the sample derived from the above equation expresses the relative difference in the isotopic ratio of the sample from that of the chosen SRM. As the differences are small, the per mil notation (‰) is used for convenience …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%