Calling Behaviors of Mixed-Species Flock Members to Novel Stimuli at Feeding Stands

Browning, Sheri A.; Morrison, Kathleen E.; Newton, Carrie; Terry, Vince; Winters, Suzanne; Freeberg, Freeberg

doi:10.1037/e693422011-001

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We used multiple stimuli in the predator class and in the nonpredator class (control + novel) to avoid pseudoreplication (Johnson & Freeberg, 2016). Chickadees respond to novel stimuli in aviary contexts in ways intermediate to the birds’ responses to control and predator stimuli (Browning, 2015). These predator stimuli had been used in previous studies with chickadees and tufted titmice, Baeolophus bicolor , and were known to be effective stimuli at eliciting antipredator behavior (Bartmess-LeVasseur, Branch, Browning, Owens, & Freeberg, 2010; Zachau & Freeberg, 2012; Book & Freeberg, 2015; Freeberg, Book, & Weiner, 2016; Cantwell, Johnson, Kaschel, Love, & Freeberg, 2016).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Carolina chickadee (Poecile carolinensis) calling behavior in response to threats and in flight: Flockmate familiarity matters.

Coppinger¹,

Launay

Freeberg³

2018

Journal of Comparative Psychology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Signalers can vary their vocal behavior, depending on the presence or absence of conspecific group members, and on the composition of the group. Here we asked whether Carolina chickadee () signalers varied their vocal behavior, depending on whether they were in the presence of familiar or unfamiliar flockmates. We sorted 32 Carolina chickadees into 4 groups with 4 familiar birds each and 4 groups with 4 unfamiliar birds each and recorded their behavior in seminatural aviary settings. We presented the familiar and unfamiliar aviary groups with a variety of stimuli ranging in level of threat and assessed birds' calling behavior in these contexts. Birds housed with familiar flockmates called sooner in threatening stimulus presentations compared with birds housed with unfamiliar flockmates. Call rates and note compositions of calls produced did not differ for the 2 types of flock. Upon release from the captive aviaries, birds from familiar flocks were also more likely to call in flight than were birds from unfamiliar aviaries. These findings suggest that chickadees vary their calling behavior as a function of experience with their surrounding social audience and provide insight into mechanisms of flock cohesion and relationship formation and maintenance within flocks. (PsycINFO Database Record

show abstract