2013
DOI: 10.1121/1.4799224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calling in gray treefrog choruses: modifications and mysteries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In terms of female preferences, there is mixed evidence that call duration predominates over call rate in female decisions (Gerhardt et al 1996; Ward et al 2013), and preference strength for either characteristic weakens as its magnitude increases, which should weaken selection towards either extreme of the trade-off axis (Tanner et al 2017). There may be other advantages for males to resolve the trade-off by producing longer calls at lower rates, for instance if longer calls could stand out better against the background noise of the chorus, although evidence for such a benefit is limited (Bee and Schwartz 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of female preferences, there is mixed evidence that call duration predominates over call rate in female decisions (Gerhardt et al 1996; Ward et al 2013), and preference strength for either characteristic weakens as its magnitude increases, which should weaken selection towards either extreme of the trade-off axis (Tanner et al 2017). There may be other advantages for males to resolve the trade-off by producing longer calls at lower rates, for instance if longer calls could stand out better against the background noise of the chorus, although evidence for such a benefit is limited (Bee and Schwartz 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this hypothesis should be properly tested because despite the fact that it is theoretical appealing, there is no conclusive empirical support. Current evidence in the calling strategies of Hyla chrysoscelis suggests that males do not necessarily profit significantly from producing longer calls at slower rates in terms of increasing their overall attractiveness to females, overcoming interference by overlapping calls, or increasing the detection of their calls in conspecific noise (Bee & Schwartz ). Despite the robust and directional nature of the call modifications observed in several species, the authors concluded that the evolutionary function of these modifications remains unclear in most of them.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%