2021
DOI: 10.1037/aap0000273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calling our souls home: A HMong epistemology for creating new narratives.

Abstract: This article highlights the intersections of political and psychological aspects in the construction of HMong identity and knowledge in academic research. Specifically, in politicizing the psychological and bringing psychology into politics, we intervene in the dehumanizing and limiting representations of HMong Americans that inflict material, ideological, and psychological violence toward HMong Americans. Drawing on interdisciplinary theories, research, and our own personal narratives, we show HMong creative … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another dimension of complexity involves the multiple and conflicting discourses that make sense of policy, which is emphasized here to appreciate how such discourses leave open possibilities for both narrow and distorted conceptions and broader, more expansive conceptions of justice (Guinier & Torres, 2014). Realizing this, we urge substantive engagement with BIPOC emotions, knowledge, and stories, which can bring about not only different, but also liberatory possibilities (Guinier & Torres, 2014; Vue, 2021a; Vue et al, 2023; Vue & Mouavangsou, 2021). Furthermore, noting how all discursive practices, even those that proclaim to be neutral and objective, are emotionally laden (Ahmed, 2004) means that closely attending to the complex systems and environments of policy demands inquiry into racialized emotional dynamics.…”
Section: Discussion: the Affective Logic Of Whiteness And Pedagogies ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another dimension of complexity involves the multiple and conflicting discourses that make sense of policy, which is emphasized here to appreciate how such discourses leave open possibilities for both narrow and distorted conceptions and broader, more expansive conceptions of justice (Guinier & Torres, 2014). Realizing this, we urge substantive engagement with BIPOC emotions, knowledge, and stories, which can bring about not only different, but also liberatory possibilities (Guinier & Torres, 2014; Vue, 2021a; Vue et al, 2023; Vue & Mouavangsou, 2021). Furthermore, noting how all discursive practices, even those that proclaim to be neutral and objective, are emotionally laden (Ahmed, 2004) means that closely attending to the complex systems and environments of policy demands inquiry into racialized emotional dynamics.…”
Section: Discussion: the Affective Logic Of Whiteness And Pedagogies ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior investigations of the Hmong experience and perspective have been represented through damage-centered research as “culturally maladaptive and structurally determined by white supremacy and coloniality” (Vue & Mouavangsou, 2021, p. 267). This approach rarely considers the social, cultural, political, and historical context and broader structures of power influencing the lives and narratives of Hmong people.…”
Section: Intersectionalitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It reimagines what it would mean to have a voice and agency in one's own epistemology. Vue and Mouabangsou (2021) present another epistemological examination, in their article "Calling Our Souls Home: A HMong Epistemology for Creating New Narrative." They present an interdisciplinary analysis of HMong ways of knowing that center HMong culture, meaning-making, and spirituality.…”
Section: Articles In This Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It reimagines what it would mean to have a voice and agency in one’s own epistemology. Vue and Mouabangsou (2021) present another epistemological examination, in their article “Calling Our Souls Home: A HMong Epistemology for Creating New Narrative.” They present an interdisciplinary analysis of HMong ways of knowing that center HMong culture, meaning-making, and spirituality. Through an interdisciplinary dialogue that brings the political lens to psychology, the authors challenge the pathology-focused narratives on the HMong people and present ways in which liberatory psychological perspectives align with centering HMong lived experiences.…”
Section: Articles In This Special Issuementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation