2013
DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2013.301262
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calls for Removing All Lead Paint From US Housing Are Misguided

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An editorial in the same journal issue suggested “the only solution” was primary prevention of Pb poisoning from lead-based paint and complete removal or replacement of lead-based paint before a child lives in a home (14). Other researchers do not support the paint-only approach because of its limited scope and the potential to increase Pb dust through the process of abatement (15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An editorial in the same journal issue suggested “the only solution” was primary prevention of Pb poisoning from lead-based paint and complete removal or replacement of lead-based paint before a child lives in a home (14). Other researchers do not support the paint-only approach because of its limited scope and the potential to increase Pb dust through the process of abatement (15).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data on the implementation and effectiveness of these policies are not widely available (Korfmacher & Hanley, 2013). There are ongoing scholarly arguments about whether it is individual behavior change or institutional behavior and policies that will resolve the problem of lead poisoning (Jacobs, 2013; Korfmacher & Hanley, 2013; Rosner & Markowitz, 2012, 2013a, 2013b; Ryan, 2013). In this context, this article provides an example of a multipronged approach consisting of regulatory policy, the infrastructure to support it, a strong surveillance system to track the results, and a broad campaign to educate and increase awareness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been considerable discussion in the public health community and various literature about the appropriate balance between public health measures focusing on changing individual behavior and those changing institutional practices, environments, and policies. Both elements are necessary to address childhood lead poisoning; namely, a strong policy and legal structure that supports individual actions (Jacobs, 2013; Korfmacher & Hanley, 2013; Rosner & Markowitz, 2012, 2013a, 2013b; Ryan, 2013). Educational and behavioral interventions alone set expectations higher than an individual parent may be empowered to achieve; while enforcement alone also fails if day-to-day maintenance and prevention cannot be undertaken by both the resident and the building owner.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The cost-effectiveness needs to be assessed to guide future prevention efforts. 3 Lead is one of the many toxicants (biphenyls, phthalates, mercury, manganese, arsenic, etc.) that pose health threats to children, and The Recommendations may be adapted to other confirmed and suspected toxicants and chemicals of uncertain toxicity.…”
Section: Zhang Et Al Respondmentioning
confidence: 99%