2011
DOI: 10.4161/chan.5.4.16821
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calmodulin overexpression does not alter Cav1.2 function or oligomerization state

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this work, we demonstrated that CaM binds the N-terminus of Na v 1.5, which resembles CaM binding to the NTD of Ca v 1.2 2,17,33,34 . This interaction seems to be crucial for the dominant-negative effect, in which a Na v 1.5 NTD variant identified in BrS patients negatively regulates wild-type channel function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this work, we demonstrated that CaM binds the N-terminus of Na v 1.5, which resembles CaM binding to the NTD of Ca v 1.2 2,17,33,34 . This interaction seems to be crucial for the dominant-negative effect, in which a Na v 1.5 NTD variant identified in BrS patients negatively regulates wild-type channel function.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Firstly, calmodulin binds the NTD of the voltage-gated calcium channel Ca v 1.2 at two different sites 2,17 , and plays a role in C-terminal dimerization of Ca v 1.2 2,34 and Na v 1.5 2 . Secondly, the NTDs of Na v 1.5 and Ca v 1.2 both contain a highly conserved sequence consisting of the residues PIRRA ( Figure 6A,B ), herein the PIRRA motif.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to endogenous CaM, Ca V 1.2 CDI in oocytes is robust 6; 23; 30; 48 . We had shown previously that even at a 60:1 excess of CaM:Ca V 1.2 mRNA, CaM expression did not further affect CDI as measured by the fraction of current decrease at 300 milliseconds (t i300 ) 49 . In contrast to these results, changes in CaBP1:Ca V 1.2 mRNA ratios caused clear alterations in t i300 and loss of CDI (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Considering potential roles for CaM at the Na v 1.5 NTD, known effects of CaM binding to the NTD and CTD of Ca v 1.2, and to the CTD of Na v 1.5 may provide valuable insights. At the CTD of Na v 1.5 and Ca v 1.2, CaM is involved in channel dimerization [31][32][33], while CaM binding to the Ca v 1.2 CTD and NTD affects calcium-dependent inactivation [31][32][33]. At the Na v 1.5 C-terminal IQ motif, CaM interaction reduces the late sodium current [40], and affects voltage-dependence of activation in a calcium-dependent manner [33,41,42].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%