2013
DOI: 10.1021/ma3020036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Calorimetric Glass Transition of Single Polystyrene Ultrathin Films

Abstract: The calorimetric glass transition (T g) is measured for single polystyrene ultrathin films using a commercial rapid-scanning chip calorimeter as a function of cooling rate and film thickness. Films have been prepared in two ways: spin-cast films placed on a layer of inert oil or grease and films directly spin-cast on the back of the calorimetric chip. For the films on oil or on grease, the 160 nm thick films show results consistent with those of a bulk sample measured by conventional DSC. On the other hand, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

27
152
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 137 publications
(179 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
27
152
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently the assumption that the curve T f 0 vs. log q mimics the temperature dependence of the equilibrium relaxation time results in a slight underestimation of the relaxation time at higher temperatures and a slight overestimation of the temperature dependence and fragility. Both the normalized activation energy and fragility are consistent with our prior work on this high molecular weight polystyrene, with values calculated directly from the data located between those by conventional DSC (Dh/R = 124 AE 0.4 kK, m = 144 AE 0.4) [25] and by Flash DSC (Dh/R = 93 AE 0.2 kK, m = 107 AE 0.2) [26]. We note that for works over a limited range of cooling rates, a linear relationship between log q and reciprocal temperature T g or T f 0 is often assumed [25,28,50,52,53].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Consequently the assumption that the curve T f 0 vs. log q mimics the temperature dependence of the equilibrium relaxation time results in a slight underestimation of the relaxation time at higher temperatures and a slight overestimation of the temperature dependence and fragility. Both the normalized activation energy and fragility are consistent with our prior work on this high molecular weight polystyrene, with values calculated directly from the data located between those by conventional DSC (Dh/R = 124 AE 0.4 kK, m = 144 AE 0.4) [25] and by Flash DSC (Dh/R = 93 AE 0.2 kK, m = 107 AE 0.2) [26]. We note that for works over a limited range of cooling rates, a linear relationship between log q and reciprocal temperature T g or T f 0 is often assumed [25,28,50,52,53].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…5 along with our previous results for conventional DSC [25,26] and rapid-scanning chip calorimetry [26]. The cooling rate dependence of T f 0 for this study is based on results from four separate chips and samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For example, it has been demonstrated that under different temperatures, nanomaterials behave differently [38]. For instance, Gao et al [39] and Williams et al [40]. showed that for a single layer of polymer film, the thinner the film, the lower its glass transition temperature, T g .…”
Section: Mitigation Of Sensitivity Dropmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uthaipan et al [31] showed for EPDM/PP and EOC/PP that particles acting as nucleating agents can counteract the suppressed crystallization at undercooling. For amorphous polymers like PS [32] or PC [33] a shift of the glass transition temperature to a higher value with increasing cooling rate was reported.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%