2004
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9496(2004)130:6(480)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CalSim: Generalized Model for Reservoir System Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
99
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 129 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
99
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This estimate was developed using a reservoir system operations model (Draper et al, 2004) and assumes a 2011 level of development for an 82-year hydrologic sequence (1922 to 2003). The current long-term annual average water supply of 51.6 billion m 3 yr −1 estimated by CDWR (2012) exceeds the natural water supply in our analysis by 1.5 billion m 3 yr −1 due to (1) groundwater overdraft of 0.9 billion m 3 yr −1 in the Sacramento and San Joaquin basins and (2) Sacramento River Basin imports of 0.6 billion m 3 yr −1 from the US Bureau of Reclamation Trinity River Diversion Project, a project that transfers water from Lewiston Reservoir through the Clear Creek Tunnel to the Sacramento River (CDWR, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This estimate was developed using a reservoir system operations model (Draper et al, 2004) and assumes a 2011 level of development for an 82-year hydrologic sequence (1922 to 2003). The current long-term annual average water supply of 51.6 billion m 3 yr −1 estimated by CDWR (2012) exceeds the natural water supply in our analysis by 1.5 billion m 3 yr −1 due to (1) groundwater overdraft of 0.9 billion m 3 yr −1 in the Sacramento and San Joaquin basins and (2) Sacramento River Basin imports of 0.6 billion m 3 yr −1 from the US Bureau of Reclamation Trinity River Diversion Project, a project that transfers water from Lewiston Reservoir through the Clear Creek Tunnel to the Sacramento River (CDWR, 2012).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These three estimates of delta outflow -natural, current and unimpaired -were estimated using a synthetic multi-year hydrologic sequence utilizing a level of development approach (Draper et al, 2004). This method routes the same amount of water (rim inflows plus precipitation) over a defined historical period assuming frozen conditions such as land use, flood control and water supply facility operations, and environmental regulations.…”
Section: Level Of Development Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed agro-hydrological spate irrigation system integrated simulation model uses three linked sub-models: a water allocation simulator, a soil moisture and crop yield model, and a crop choice model. The first is a conventional optimisation-driven water allocation simulator which allows representing water sharing arrangements in a generic way [26]. The simulator allocates flood inflow volumes to the major diversion points (weirs in our case) based on analyst-defined distribution priorities.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous statewide water management models have already been developed to determine optimum surface water and groundwater allocations given different management objectives. Model drivers included economic considerations (Jenkins et al 2001); water supply allocation and storage priorities (Draper et al 2004); human and environmental water demands (Yates et al 2005); and historical surface water, land use, and water diversions [California Central Valley GroundwaterSurface Water Simulation Model (C2VSim) ;Brush et al 2013]. These models typically require either a high number of inputs or parameters.…”
Section: Global and California Reservoir Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%