2020
DOI: 10.1017/9781911623441
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Camberwell Assessment of Need (CAN)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Service User-Rated Outcome Assessments The assessments of needs would be done using the scale of Camberwell Assessment of Needs-Research (CAN-R). 14 The CAN is an interviewer-administrated instrument for a comprehensive assessment of 22 different health and social needs of patients with severe and enduring mental illness. Given the lack of any validated tools for CMDs, this tool is being used for the population under study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Service User-Rated Outcome Assessments The assessments of needs would be done using the scale of Camberwell Assessment of Needs-Research (CAN-R). 14 The CAN is an interviewer-administrated instrument for a comprehensive assessment of 22 different health and social needs of patients with severe and enduring mental illness. Given the lack of any validated tools for CMDs, this tool is being used for the population under study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Step two evaluated delivered services in relation to present individual needs. Therefore, we used a strategy, inspired by the Camberwell Assessment of Needs (CAN) [47], with the value labels "no need", "serviced needs", and "unserviced needs". Assessments were made irrespective of the success of the support.…”
Section: Variables and Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This might suggest that these supported accommodation services are indeed accepting people who are more unwell than the English equivalent services (RC), as suggested earlier, and that the CTRPs perform a role somewhere between the English RCs and inpatient mental health rehabilitation units. This explanation seems likely since most unmet needs in the Verona service users were in the domains of 'health' and 'functioning'(CAN [28]). Despite this, quality of life was higher amongst the Italian service users in all three types of accommodation.…”
Section: Service User Characteristics Confirmed That Supported Accommmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With regard to service characteristics, these were: expected length of stay; actual length of stay; mean total places; mean occupied places; mean new admissions in past 12 months; mean successful moves to more independent accommodation within 30 months. Service user characteristics comprised: socio-demographic variables (age, gender, marital status, employment status, previous accommodation); mental health problems and service use (primary diagnosis, problematic alcohol, and substance use, years of contact with mental health services, mean previous admissions, mean previous compulsory admissions); needs (assessed in the English survey using the Camberwell Assessment of Needs Short Appraisal Scale [CANSAS] and, in the Italian survey, with the full version [CAN] (both comprise 22items which assess the amount and type of help needed and received, denoted as total, met and unmet needs)[28]); and quality of life (assessed in both surveys by the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life[MANSA], which provides the participant's subjective assessment of a number of life domains and produces a total mean score between 1 (completely dissatisfied) and 7 (completely satisfied)][29])…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%