2012
DOI: 10.1179/175638012x13285409187919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Camels, Copper and Donkeys in the Early Iron Age of the Southern Levant: Timna Revisited

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
21
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This finding implies that both haplogroups (H A and H B ) were already present in the Levantine herds of the fourth to seventh century CE. Different estimates of the time to the most recent common ancestor (TMRCA) of H A and H B [>5,700 y ago (ya)] (SI Appendix, Table S6) predate the assumed period of domestication during the end of the second or beginning of the first millennium BCE (7,8,12,14), suggesting that at least two, but more likely a minimum of six wild maternal lineages were captured during the process of domestication. The eight ancient wild dromedary samples from four different locations in the UAE presented at least six different mitochondrial haplotypes (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This finding implies that both haplogroups (H A and H B ) were already present in the Levantine herds of the fourth to seventh century CE. Different estimates of the time to the most recent common ancestor (TMRCA) of H A and H B [>5,700 y ago (ya)] (SI Appendix, Table S6) predate the assumed period of domestication during the end of the second or beginning of the first millennium BCE (7,8,12,14), suggesting that at least two, but more likely a minimum of six wild maternal lineages were captured during the process of domestication. The eight ancient wild dromedary samples from four different locations in the UAE presented at least six different mitochondrial haplotypes (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The domestication of the dromedary likely happened in the late second millennium BCE as deduced from: (i) diachronic osteometric analysis illustrating a significant decrease in bone size in remains dating to the very end of the second or beginning of the first millennium BCE (ca. 1,100-800 BCE) (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12); (ii) changes in the cultural context, i.e., increased representation of dromedary bones in settlement refuse vs. large concentrations in sites without architecture, e.g., site of Al-Sufouh, United Arab Emirates (UAE); and (iii) figurines and representations of indubitably domesticated dromedaries (13). Based on the available zooarchaeological records, it is assumed that the wild one-humped camel did not survive the start of the CE (8,9,12,14), in contrast to the wild ancestors of most other livestock species (15,16).…”
Section: Significancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on osteological and pictorial evidence as well as cultural context, the domestication of dromedaries probably happened in the late second millennium (1100-1800) BCE (Uerpmann & Uerpmann 2002;von den Driesch & Obermaier 2007;Iamoni 2009and Grigson 2012Uerpmann & Uerpman 2012;Magee 2015). Mitochondrial, nuclear and ancient DNA analyses of a global dataset of modern individuals and up to 7000-year-old wild dromedary samples revealed shared ancestry between wild dromedaries from the southeast coast of the Arabian Peninsula and modern animals ( Fig.…”
Section: Domestication Of Dromedariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Dromedaries are widespread throughout northern and eastern Africa, the Arabian Peninsula and southwest Asia, and a large feral population exists in Australia (Köhler‐Rollefson ; Spencer & Woolnough ). Throughout their range, dromedaries are bred for a multitude of purposes including meat, milk production, transportation, wool and sport (Bulliet ; Grigson ). Archaeozoological evidence suggests that the domestication of dromedaries took place between 3000 and 4000 years ago in the east coast of the Arabian Peninsula (Uerpmann & Uerpmann ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%