Camera Self-Calibration with GNSS Constrained Bundle Adjustment for Weakly Structured Long Corridor UAV Images

Abstract

Camera self-calibration determines the precision and robustness of AT (aerial triangulation) for UAV (unmanned aerial vehicle) images. The UAV images collected from long transmission line corridors are critical configurations, which may lead to the “bowl effect” with camera self-calibration. To solve such problems, traditional methods rely on more than three GCPs (ground control points), while this study designs a new self-calibration method with only one GCP. First, existing camera distortion models are grouped into two categories, i.e., physical and mathematical models, and their mathematical formulas are exploited in detail. Second, within an incremental SfM (Structure from Motion) framework, a camera self-calibration method is designed, which combines the strategies for initializing camera distortion parameters and fusing high-precision GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) observations. The former is achieved by using an iterative optimization algorithm that progressively optimizes camera parameters; the latter is implemented through inequality constrained BA (bundle adjustment). Finally, by using four UAV datasets collected from two sites with two data acquisition modes, the proposed algorithm is comprehensively analyzed and verified, and the experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method can dramatically alleviate the “bowl effect” of self-calibration for weakly structured long corridor UAV images, and the horizontal and vertical accuracy can reach 0.04 m and 0.05 m, respectively, when using one GCP. In addition, compared with open-source and commercial software, the proposed method achieves competitive or better performance.

A Simple Way to Reduce 3D Model Deformation in Smartphone Photogrammetry

“…The IO accuracy is also unfavorable when the network of images is built with only a few strips, which is typical for linear objects [ 11 ]. In those cases, the IO errors distort the EO, which leads to the so-called bowl effect [ 12 ].…”

Optimising UAV Data Acquisition and Processing for Photogrammetry: A Review

“…Also for areas with low topographic diversity, a correlation between IOP and EOP is generated. This translates into the occurrence of a bowl effect [63,68]. In another study [69], it was shown that elimination of the bowl effect can be achieved by densifying the distribution of GCPs.…”

Low-Tech and Low-Cost System for High-Resolution Underwater RTK Photogrammetry in Coastal Shallow Waters

“…This effect is widely documented in the literature on close-range photogrammetry (e.g., [16,57,58]) and is the result of non-optimal self-calibration. Many studies have demonstrated the benefits of including oblique images in the image network to reduce these effects (e.g., [16,49,59,60]). Having at least one tilted camera therefore has the double advantage of collecting better images of the lateral faces of the coral heads in the axis of the trajectory, but also of optimizing the geometry of the image network to limit distortions as much as possible.…”