2018
DOI: 10.24189/ncr.2018.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Camera traps as a tool for Carnivore conservation in a mosaic of Protected Areas in the Pantanal wetlands, Brazil

Abstract: Although known globally for its biodiversity, only around 5% of the Brazilian Pantanal is protected. The Network for Protection and Conservation of Amolar Mountain Ridge is an informal initiative that legally protects over 2000 km 2 of the Pantanal biome. Several camera-trapping surveys were carried out at Amolar Mountain Ridge from August 2011 to September 2013 in order to increase our knowledge of the species occurrence and its ecological requirements. The aims of this study were : 1) to inventory the carniv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some subtle differences were observed in relation to D. tajacu (crepuscular in this study), which was mostly diurnal in Bolivian Amazon (Gómez et al 2005), and cathemeral in other areas of the Pantanal (Porfirio et al 2017b). Dasyprocta azarae and N. nasua are diurnal, as observed in other areas of the Pantanal and Bolivian Amazon (Gómez et al 2005, Porfirio et al 2017b, Porfirio et al 2018), while T. tetradactyla was nocturnal, as observed in the humid Chaco of Argentina (Huck et al 2017). Euphractus sexcinctus and D. novemcinctus are diurnal and nocturnal, respectively, which confirmed activity patterns found in other sites of the Pantanal and Cerrado (Maccarini et al 2015.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Some subtle differences were observed in relation to D. tajacu (crepuscular in this study), which was mostly diurnal in Bolivian Amazon (Gómez et al 2005), and cathemeral in other areas of the Pantanal (Porfirio et al 2017b). Dasyprocta azarae and N. nasua are diurnal, as observed in other areas of the Pantanal and Bolivian Amazon (Gómez et al 2005, Porfirio et al 2017b, Porfirio et al 2018), while T. tetradactyla was nocturnal, as observed in the humid Chaco of Argentina (Huck et al 2017). Euphractus sexcinctus and D. novemcinctus are diurnal and nocturnal, respectively, which confirmed activity patterns found in other sites of the Pantanal and Cerrado (Maccarini et al 2015.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Por otra parte, algunos estudios de fototrampeo en otras áreas de la distribución de P. cancrivorus han reportado bajas o muy bajas frecuencias de captura de la especie (i.e., <1 registro/1.000 trampas noche; Tobler et al 2008;Porfirio et al 2018) y alta latencia para su primera detección (e.g., 294 días según Blake & Mosquera 2014), mientras que otros han reportado frecuencias de registro significativamente mayores (i.e., >30 registros/1.000 trampas noche; Arispe et al 2008;Bianchi et al 2016;Torres-Domínguez et al 2022). La frecuencia de captura observada en nuestro estudio (<0,1 registro/1.000 trampas noche) es una de las más bajas reportadas para toda la distribución de la es-pecie, y podría ser resultado tanto del ingreso reciente de este carnívoro al Delta bonaerense como de la posición relativa del área de estudio en el límite de su distribución.…”
unclassified