2022
DOI: 10.1007/s10623-021-00995-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cameron–Liebler k-sets in subspaces and non-existence conditions

Abstract: In this article we generalize the concepts that were used in the PhD thesis of Drudge to classify Cameron-Liebler line classes in PG(n, q), n ≥ 3, to Cameron-Liebler sets of k-spaces in PG(n, q) and AG(n, q). In his PhD thesis, Drudge proved that every Cameron-Liebler line class in PG(n, q) intersects every 3-dimensional subspace in a Cameron-Liebler line class in that subspace. We are using the generalization of this result for sets of k-spaces in PG(n, q) and AG(n, q). Together with a basic counting argument… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nowadays many counterexamples to the Conjecture of Cameron and Liebler are known if (n, k) = (4, 2) and q 3; see [8,14,22,23,31,33]. The general case of k > 2 has been investigated more recently, for instance see [4,15,16,26,35,41]. Indeed, it has been shown in [26] that Conjecture 5 holds for k 2 and q ∈ {2, 3, 4, 5} if we exclude the case (n, k) = (4, 2).…”
Section: Cameron-liebler Line Classes and Boolean Functions On The Gr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nowadays many counterexamples to the Conjecture of Cameron and Liebler are known if (n, k) = (4, 2) and q 3; see [8,14,22,23,31,33]. The general case of k > 2 has been investigated more recently, for instance see [4,15,16,26,35,41]. Indeed, it has been shown in [26] that Conjecture 5 holds for k 2 and q ∈ {2, 3, 4, 5} if we exclude the case (n, k) = (4, 2).…”
Section: Cameron-liebler Line Classes and Boolean Functions On The Gr...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over the years, there have been many interesting extensions of this result. See [2, 9, 20, 23, 29, 31] for Cameron–Liebler sets of k $k$‐spaces in PG(n,q) $(n,q)$, [12] for Cameron–Liebler classes in finite sets, and [19] for Cameron–Liebler sets in several classical distance‐regular graphs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The many equivalent ways to describe a Cameron-Liebler set, both algebraically and combinatorially, sparked the interest of many researchers, and allowed for generalisations. Cameron-Liebler sets of k-spaces in PG(n, q) were studied in [3,4,16,42,47], and Cameron-Liebler sets of subsets of finite sets were discussed in [19,29,43]. In [18] Cameron-Liebler sets of generators in finite classical polar spaces were introduced, and those were further investigated in [17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%