2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcta.2019.04.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cameron–Liebler line classes of PG(3,q) admitting PGL(2,q)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many nontrivial (and nonisomorphic) examples of Cameron-Liebler line classes have been found recently (see [8,[11][12][13]24]), which thus give rise to various examples of perfect sets in the corresponding graphs of MOLS.…”
Section: Mutually Orthogonal Latin Squaresmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many nontrivial (and nonisomorphic) examples of Cameron-Liebler line classes have been found recently (see [8,[11][12][13]24]), which thus give rise to various examples of perfect sets in the corresponding graphs of MOLS.…”
Section: Mutually Orthogonal Latin Squaresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A straightforward calculation shows that it is a (q2q1)‐perfect set, whereas the graph Σ, which is the bilinear‐forms graph Bilq(2×2) (see, eg, [7, Section 9.5.A]), can be viewed as a graph of q1 MOLS of order q2. Many nontrivial (and nonisomorphic) examples of Cameron–Liebler line classes have been found recently (see ), which thus give rise to various examples of perfect sets in the corresponding graphs of MOLS.…”
Section: Mutually Orthogonal Latin Squaresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that via the field reduction [18] one can construct tight sets of Q + (6b − 1, q) from a variety of those of Q + (5, q b ) that have been discovered recently [7,8,9,10,14,15]. Thus, Q + (7, q) and Q + (9, q) seem to be the first unexplored cases, where we are not aware of any non-trivial tight sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These line classes were later called Cameron-Liebler line sets in their honor. Many characterisation and classification results about Cameron-Liebler sets were obtained (see [6,12,15,26,30,31,32,39,40,46] amongst others). The many equivalent ways to describe a Cameron-Liebler set, both algebraically and combinatorially, sparked the interest of many researchers, and allowed for generalisations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%