CAMOTE-computer aided module testing and design environment

Dogša, Tomaž; Rozman, Ivan

doi:10.1109/icsm.1988.10194

Cited by 10 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Previous research on regression testing has addressed many topics, including test environments and automation [23][24][25][26], capture playback mechanisms [27], test suite management [27][28][29][30][31], program size reduction [32], and regression testability [33]. Most recent research on regression testing, however, concerns selective retest techniques (e.g.…”

Section: Regression Testingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Regression test selection for C++ software

Rothermel

Harrold

Dedhia

2000

Softw. Test. Verif. Reliab.

121

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Regression Testingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Regression test selection for C++ software

Rothermel

Harrold

Dedhia

2000

Softw. Test. Verif. Reliab.

121

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…When performing type (3) tasks, one technique for testing whether or not the software operates with the performance required by the specifications after the software was modified is to perform regression testing [6,10,13]. Regression testing, which has been put to practical use during actual software maintenance, is used for examining whether corrections were performed properly.…”

Section: Maintenance Tasksmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Regression testing [6,10,13] has been widely used for these operation verification activities that occur during development. Also, the software that is developed is often managed by using a software management system such as a revision management system [1,16].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Program-delta oriented debugging supporting method DMET

2006

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

SUMMARYResearch has been conducted on methods of automatically performing tests that focus on the delta (difference) between a revision that is known to function normally in advance and a revision that contains defects to identify the causes of the defects. However, since software had to be created from source programs for each test, an extremely long test time had been required. Also, since the emphasis had only been on the testing tasks and no consideration was given to debugging tasks, these methods were not practical. Therefore, in the current research, the authors propose the DMET debugging technique, which can be used for actual software maintenance. DMET, which reduces the test execution time compared with conventional techniques, supports the entire sequential processing flow from testing to debugging. Also, to verify the effectiveness of the proposed technique, the authors implemented the DSUS development support environment, which uses DMET, and performed comparison experiments. From the results, it was apparent that using DMET enabled the total debugging time to be shortened.

show abstract