1993
DOI: 10.2307/2111535
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Campaign Strategy in Presidential Primaries, 1976-88

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Even candidates who do well and appear invincible still use the media, both paid and free, to attack their opponent on the horizon, their inter-party rival. Gurian and Haynes (1993) have also found that candidates, particularly higher tier candidates, tend to outlay more resources when there are more delegates up for grabs. This suggests that candidates are willing to invest in more activity when the reward is higher.…”
Section: Intermediated Candidate Attacks and Rival Performancementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Even candidates who do well and appear invincible still use the media, both paid and free, to attack their opponent on the horizon, their inter-party rival. Gurian and Haynes (1993) have also found that candidates, particularly higher tier candidates, tend to outlay more resources when there are more delegates up for grabs. This suggests that candidates are willing to invest in more activity when the reward is higher.…”
Section: Intermediated Candidate Attacks and Rival Performancementioning
confidence: 95%
“…Because candidates court different constituencies (Gurian and Haynes 1993), each candidate makes different strategic decisions resulting in very different primary contests across states. The first is that frontloading increases primary compression, leading to a larger number of contests on any given day.…”
Section: The Consequences Of Frontloading For Meaningful Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, we hypothesize that the specific strategies that candidates utilize to influence the media are determined by their competitive position. Frontrunners desire one type of response from the media and dark horses another: each acts accordingly in terms of how they spend their money (Gurian 1986;Gurian and Haynes 1993), how they treat their opponents (Haynes and Rhine 1998), and how they attempt to frame their campaigns for the news media (Ansolabehere et al 1993).…”
Section: Field Position and Candidate Messaging Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%