2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2021.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Campus Food Pantry Use Addresses a Gap Among California Public University Students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these designation programs have no enforcement mechanisms to ensure that the requirements for designation continue to be met, early evaluation research suggests that these programs can be effective for improving food security status. 71 Similar to the federal level, there is growing state-level legislative attention and enthusiasm; however, 37 states had no relevant legislation. 70 This leaves a lot of room for improvement and advocacy, as states have the capacity to develop and implement more comprehensive approaches that go beyond federal food assistance programs.…”
Section: New Efforts For Larger-scale Policy Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these designation programs have no enforcement mechanisms to ensure that the requirements for designation continue to be met, early evaluation research suggests that these programs can be effective for improving food security status. 71 Similar to the federal level, there is growing state-level legislative attention and enthusiasm; however, 37 states had no relevant legislation. 70 This leaves a lot of room for improvement and advocacy, as states have the capacity to develop and implement more comprehensive approaches that go beyond federal food assistance programs.…”
Section: New Efforts For Larger-scale Policy Interventionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the high prevalence of food insecurity in the college environment and its relevance to student success and well-being, universities are seeking solutions to food insecurity by implementing campus food resources like food pantries (Becerra & Becerra, 2020;College & University Food Bank Alliance, n.d.;Martinez et al, 2019Martinez et al, , 2020Payne-Sturges et al, 2018;Weaver et al, 2020). Campus food pantries provide students with immediate access to food, making them a potential source for supporting students and alleviating food insecurity (Esaryk et al, 2021;. This strategy is increasingly employed by universities to address the need for food access and is being used by students more frequently (Esaryk et al, 2021;Gammon et al, 2021;Weaver et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Campus food pantries provide students with immediate access to food, making them a potential source for supporting students and alleviating food insecurity (Esaryk et al, 2021;. This strategy is increasingly employed by universities to address the need for food access and is being used by students more frequently (Esaryk et al, 2021;Gammon et al, 2021;Weaver et al, 2021). For example, all ten campuses in the UC system have campus food pantries, basic needs centers to support student food security, and annual basic needs budgets that each campus utilizes with its own tailored approach (UC Basic Needs Initiative, n.d.).…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the college student population, reasons regarding low program participation are unknown, however the authors hypothesize that knowledge about food assistance programs is low. Students are often newly independent and may have limited awareness of the many resources available to them including those provided through the university and social programs to improve housing and food access [ 32 , 33 , 34 , 35 ]. Alongside the potential benefits of social support programs like CalFresh for students in California and the U.S., the utility of these social food benefits may serve as a model outside of North America, in general and college populations alike [ 28 , 36 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%