2000
DOI: 10.1006/jcis.2000.6830
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can a Dynamic Contact Angle Be Understood in Terms of a Friction Coefficient?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
108
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
108
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In our experiments, θ d was 68 • for water, which agrees well with the experimental data obtained in quartz capillaries [20]. For ethanol, θ d was smaller than the dynamic contact angle for water which was in accordance with measurements made in glass capillaries with an inner radius of 0.295 mm [30]. The θ d for the 40% ethanol water mixture was 38 • , which was significantly smaller than θ d for both water and ethanol.…”
Section: Filling Kinetics Of Isopropanol Ethanol and 40% Ethanol Insupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In our experiments, θ d was 68 • for water, which agrees well with the experimental data obtained in quartz capillaries [20]. For ethanol, θ d was smaller than the dynamic contact angle for water which was in accordance with measurements made in glass capillaries with an inner radius of 0.295 mm [30]. The θ d for the 40% ethanol water mixture was 38 • , which was significantly smaller than θ d for both water and ethanol.…”
Section: Filling Kinetics Of Isopropanol Ethanol and 40% Ethanol Insupporting
confidence: 91%
“…(25) The assumptions in the approach in sections 2.1.2 and 2.1.3 taken to derive the capillary terms is that they include a quasi-equilibrium advancing state and this leads to the You g's l w equilibrium contact angle,  e . Many authors have questioned this and replaced the contact angle by either the advancing contact angle or the velocity dependent dynamic contact angle Hoff 's formula (Siebold et al, 2000;Chebbi, 2007) or molecular-kinetic theory (Hamraoui et al, 2000;Hamraoui and Nylander, 2002;Blake and de Coninck, 2004) or have considered a range of possible dynamic contact angle relationships (e.g. Popescu et al, 2008).…”
Section: Defining Equation and Its Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a visco-gravitational solution for time as a function of meniscus position does exist for the equivalent of the LucasWashburn regime (e.g. Krotov and Rusanov, 1999;Hamraoui et al 2000, Hamraoui andNylander, 2002), including for liquid-liquid systems (Mumley et al, 1986). In these problems, the role of the shape and wetting state of the walls are critical.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a velocity dependent, and hence time dependent, dynamic contact angle, θ=θ(t), is assumed a further defining equation relating the dynamic contact angle to the instantaneous speed and physical parameters is required 14,[20][21][22] . However, it is often assumed that the contact angle can be approximated to a constantθ=θ A (the advancing contact angle) and with this assumption eq.…”
Section: Theoretical Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%