2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-59716-0_38
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can a Hand-Held Navigation Device Reduce Cognitive Load? A User-Centered Approach Evaluated by 18 Surgeons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We associate the indications that the bending time could be reduced with a more intuitive guidance where no intermediate comparisons between the current and target rod shapes and no corrective bendings are necessary compared to our AR benchmark ( Wanivenhaus et al, 2019 ). Previous studies have shown that not only the navigation method is of crucial importance but that also the visualization of the guidance plays a major role in the outcome of surgical procedures ( Brendle et al, 2020 ). In this light, the smaller variability in the bending time and the number of rebending maneuvers indicates that our approach succeeds in providing clear, concise, and userindependent guidance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We associate the indications that the bending time could be reduced with a more intuitive guidance where no intermediate comparisons between the current and target rod shapes and no corrective bendings are necessary compared to our AR benchmark ( Wanivenhaus et al, 2019 ). Previous studies have shown that not only the navigation method is of crucial importance but that also the visualization of the guidance plays a major role in the outcome of surgical procedures ( Brendle et al, 2020 ). In this light, the smaller variability in the bending time and the number of rebending maneuvers indicates that our approach succeeds in providing clear, concise, and userindependent guidance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Other solutions use C-arm fluoroscopy or optical markers ( Abe et al, 2013;Liu et al, 2018 ) to register a preoperative plan to the intraoperative anatomy which allows navigating entry points or trajectories of surgical tools in percutaneous vertebroplasty and hip resurfacing, respectively. ARbased surgical navigation approaches provide the surgeons with additional information in situations where human perception is limited and consequently translate highly complex procedures into simpler tasks, as demonstrated in this user-centric approach ( Brendle et al, 2020 ). This not only reduces the risk of severe intraoperative complications but also noticeably increases the precision of the surgical outcome.…”
Section: Ar-based Surgical Navigationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Two different visualizations for angle orientation of the surgical tool were tested with 18 physicians against the visualizations used in the clinical routine. In contrast to the early findings published by Brendle et al [ 25 ], the usability advances of the proposed concept are evaluated in depth and discussed in detail. In addition, an updated angle visualization and a preliminary usability study for a proposed depth control visualization during drilling holes into vertebrae were added to this article.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Previous studies have proposed a body of AR-based navigation solutions for pedicle screw placement [40][41][42][43] . Similar approaches based on tool-mounted mobile devices have been used to provide information in the line of sight of a surgeon [44][45][46][47] . However, all these approaches have utilized visual feedback as the singular feedback modality.…”
Section: Related Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%