2017
DOI: 10.1002/jcpy.1020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can a Rude Waiter Make Your Food Less Tasty? Social Class Differences in Thinking Style and Carryover in Consumer Judgments

Abstract: Building on the notion that cognitive processes vary across social classes, we predict that social class shapes thinking style, which in turn affects consumer judgments. In doing so, we employ service failure domains as a way to understand social class effects. Across four studies, we show that, when faced with a failure incident occurring in one service dimension (e.g., rude employees), consumers in the low social class, relative to those in the high social class, carry over to influence their evaluations of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(114 reference statements)
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…class is considered an essential dimension for market segmentation (Aljukhadar et al, 2021;Kamakura & Mazzon, 2013) and determines differences in information processing (J. Lee, 2018). These cognitive differences are manifested strongly under stressful circumstances as a function of childhood SES Oi & Haas, 2019).…”
Section: Theoretical and Practical Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…class is considered an essential dimension for market segmentation (Aljukhadar et al, 2021;Kamakura & Mazzon, 2013) and determines differences in information processing (J. Lee, 2018). These cognitive differences are manifested strongly under stressful circumstances as a function of childhood SES Oi & Haas, 2019).…”
Section: Theoretical and Practical Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2019) The authors argue that when an indulgent food is advertised with a cue that sets the occasion for consumption (i.e., an occasion-setting cue), holistic (vs. analytic) thinking increases the cravings for and subsequent purchase likelihood of the featured product Gomez and Torelli (2015) For these authors, French (and not American) consumers with a salient cultural identity are more sensitive (i.e., perceive as riskier for their health) and evaluate more negatively foods that display nutrition information (versus foods that do not) Lee (2018) The results show that when faced with a failure incident occurring in one service dimension (e.g., rude employees), consumers in a low social class, relative to those in a high social class, carry over to influence their evaluations of the other service dimensions (e.g., food quality) that are unrelated to the failure incident. Cornil et al (2014) The authors state that attitude ambivalence (simultaneously desiring a food and perceiving it as unhealthy) enhances visual sensitivity to increasing portion sizes.…”
Section: Experiential Pleasure Of Food a Driving Force For Well-beingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, high class individuals report to have a higher sense of control than low class counterparts ( Kraus et al., 2009 ; Lachman and Weaver, 1998 ). Due to the different implications about one's own agency and controllability based on experiences from the given environment, low social class individuals tend to find explanations of social events based on contextual factors whereas high class individuals tend to focus on individual factors ( Kraus et al., 2009 ; Lee, 2018 ). Hence, high class individuals who tend to hold relatively high agency and efficacy of their own actions might believe their consumption behavior can be an effective means to compensate their low social self-esteem more than low class individuals who do not hold the strong agentic beliefs and a sense of control.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypothesis Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%