2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2016.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can a self-regulated strategy intervention close the achievement gap? Exploring a classroom-based intervention in 9th grade earth science

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
18
1
7

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
18
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…However, students who attended the course in a traditional format (EG II) showed higher scores than students of EG I for two subscales of LASSI (anxiety control and study aids), as well as greater gains in self-efficacy for self-regulated learning when compared to students who had not attended the course (CGs). Although overall effect sizes ranged from very small to moderate, as in previous intervention research (Wentzel and Wigfield, 2007;Andrzejewski et al, 2016;Magno, 2016), these results suggest that explicit activation of self-reflection and the use of self-reflective activities may have an impact on perceived self-efficacy for self-regulated learning. Nonetheless, this was not as strong as initially hypothesized in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, students who attended the course in a traditional format (EG II) showed higher scores than students of EG I for two subscales of LASSI (anxiety control and study aids), as well as greater gains in self-efficacy for self-regulated learning when compared to students who had not attended the course (CGs). Although overall effect sizes ranged from very small to moderate, as in previous intervention research (Wentzel and Wigfield, 2007;Andrzejewski et al, 2016;Magno, 2016), these results suggest that explicit activation of self-reflection and the use of self-reflective activities may have an impact on perceived self-efficacy for self-regulated learning. Nonetheless, this was not as strong as initially hypothesized in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Examining only the differences between pretest and posttest scores may also make it difficult to uncover the exact impact of interventions. In addition, self-report measures may not be sensitive enough to capture change (Almeida, 1992;Andrzejewski et al, 2016). It is thus recommended that future studies examine the intervention sessions qualitatively from the beginning to the end, so that the actual progress of participants can be examined more precisely.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, they analyze their beliefs about learning, their confi dence and expectations to perform the task and to reach the goals they have set. All these variables (e.g., self-effi cacy, intrinsic value) infl uence what students do or think themselves capable of doing (Zimmerman, 1998;Andrzejewski, Davis, Bruening & Poirier, 2016). Based on the assessment, they establish their goals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%