2008
DOI: 10.1214/08-ba303
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can a significance test be genuinely Bayesian?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
138
0
14

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(152 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
138
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…For the negative binomial, the two observed points will produce different significance levels and probabilities of both kinds of errors. For the first (second) sample, one stops observing whenever the number of successes reaches 3 Equation (11). For the first result, we have α = 0.18, β = 0.4 and P = 0.0; for the second, α = 0.12, β = 0.33, and P = 0.01.…”
Section: Example 3-test For One Proportion and The Likelihood Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the negative binomial, the two observed points will produce different significance levels and probabilities of both kinds of errors. For the first (second) sample, one stops observing whenever the number of successes reaches 3 Equation (11). For the first result, we have α = 0.18, β = 0.4 and P = 0.0; for the second, α = 0.12, β = 0.33, and P = 0.01.…”
Section: Example 3-test For One Proportion and The Likelihood Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a genuinely Bayesian context, the authors of [9] introduced the index e (e-value, e for evidence) as an alternative to the classical p-value, which we write with a lower-case "p". A correction to make the null hypothesis invariant under transformations was presented in [10], and a more theoretical review can be seen in [11,12]. The e-value was the basis of the solution of an astrophysical problem described in [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, if the tangential set has high posterior probability, the evidence in favor of Ω 0 is small; if it has low posterior probability, the evidence against Ω 0 is small, see [13].…”
Section: Hypotheses Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to avoid the Jeffreys-Lindley paradox, the measure of evidence (EV ) of the full Bayesian significance test (FBST) of Stern (1999, 2001) can be considered; see also Madruga et al (2001Madruga et al ( , 2003 and Pereira et al (2008). Following Cabras et al (2013), consider the set…”
Section: Tail Area Approximations For a Measure Of Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%