2013
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2393-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can a tibial tunnel in ACL surgery be placed anatomically without impinging on the femoral notch? A risk factor analysis

Abstract: If a perfect centrally positioned tibial tunnel is drilled, a real risk for femoral notch impingement exists depending on the size of the tibial ACL footprint and surgery-related factors. Therefore, in anatomical tibial tunnel placement in single bundle ACL reconstruction surgery, particular attention should be paid to size of the tunnel and drill-guide angle to minimize the risk of femoral notch impingement.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Complete footprint restoration could result in a graft that is too large at its midsubstance to fit within the intercondylar notch, potentially causing pathological impingement. 20,21,28 The isthmus of the ACL, or the region of the smallest midsubstance cross-sectional area (CSA), is naturally and appropriately sized to fit within the intercondylar notch. The dimensions of the isthmus region may provide a more suitable template for graft sizes than the larger bony insertion sites.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Complete footprint restoration could result in a graft that is too large at its midsubstance to fit within the intercondylar notch, potentially causing pathological impingement. 20,21,28 The isthmus of the ACL, or the region of the smallest midsubstance cross-sectional area (CSA), is naturally and appropriately sized to fit within the intercondylar notch. The dimensions of the isthmus region may provide a more suitable template for graft sizes than the larger bony insertion sites.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 7 , 17 , 23 , 25 , 26 It has been mostly utilized in the transtibial/isometric ACL reconstruction techniques, but many surgeons still perform notchplasty in the transportal/anatomic techniques. 12 , 15 , 18 , 25 , 28 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been utilized as an adjuvant procedure mostly in the transtibial/isometric ACL reconstruction techniques, but many surgeons still perform notchplasty in the transportal/anatomic techniques. 12 , 15 , 18 , 25 , 28 Other advantages of notchplasty include better visualization within the notch as well as an increase of the cross-sectional area of the regenerated ACL, providing more space for graft healing and enhancing the healing process. 14 , 15 , 19 However, there are concerns related to postoperative blood loss in the early phase, to knee biomechanics distortion, and even more to bone regrowth and narrowing of the notch after notchplasty, although these aspects are still debated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some useful suggestions have been provided to avoid notchplasty while performing ACLR, such as: respecting the graft free zone in the tibial footprint; 32 placing the tibial bone tunnel for the anteromedial bundle as medially as possible within its footprint to avoid wall impingement in double-bundle technique; 33 avoiding double-bundle technique in cases of narrow notch (<12 mm); 34 if a good view of the footprint is difficult to achieve, consider using an additional portal (three-portals technique); 35 in transtibial technique, if impingement is unavoidable or if it is present after graft fixation, remove bone as less as possible from the intercondylar notch; 7 8 36 avoid performing notchplasty in anatomical techniques; 4 32 35 choose the right size of the graft to avoid notch/graft mismatch and to decrease the incidence of cyclops lesions. 24 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%