2017
DOI: 10.1111/jac.12209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can additional N fertiliser ameliorate the elevated CO2‐induced depression in grain and tissue N concentrations of wheat on a high soil N background?

Abstract: Elevated CO2 stimulates crop yields but leads to lower tissue and grain nitrogen concentrations [N], raising concerns about grain quality in cereals. To test whether N fertiliser application above optimum growth requirements can alleviate the decline in tissue [N], wheat was grown in a Free Air CO2 Enrichment facility in a low‐rainfall cropping system on high soil N. Crops were grown with and without addition of 50–60 kg N/ha in 12 growing environments created by supplemental irrigation and two sowing dates ov… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
23
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
5
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with this, results from chamber‐based experiments (open‐top chambers [OTC]) suggest that the eCO 2 ‐induced reductions in GPC cannot be compensated by higher N fertilization rates, since this may simply result in additional biomass and yield production rather than GPC enhancement (Fangmeier et al, ; Weigel & Manderscheid, ). Similar results were obtained in recent experiments with wheat, explicitly designed to test this effect (Tausz et al, ; Walker, Armstrong, Panozzo, Partington, & Fitzgerald, ).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In agreement with this, results from chamber‐based experiments (open‐top chambers [OTC]) suggest that the eCO 2 ‐induced reductions in GPC cannot be compensated by higher N fertilization rates, since this may simply result in additional biomass and yield production rather than GPC enhancement (Fangmeier et al, ; Weigel & Manderscheid, ). Similar results were obtained in recent experiments with wheat, explicitly designed to test this effect (Tausz et al, ; Walker, Armstrong, Panozzo, Partington, & Fitzgerald, ).…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Elevated CO 2 has been shown to impede NO 3 − reduction (Bloom, ; Bloom et al ., ), thus negatively affecting the generation of NH 4 + for subsequent incorporation in amino acids. In support of this biochemical bottleneck it was observed that NO 3 − constituted a higher proportion of total N in plants exposed to elevated CO 2 (Bahrami et al ., ) and that additional N fertilizer was not able to counteract the decline in grain and tissue N concentrations in wheat (Tausz et al ., ). A possible way to sustain tissue N concentrations and growth responses under elevated CO 2 might be to supply plants with NH 4 + instead of NO 3 − (Rubio‐Asensio and Bloom, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The results for the cisgenic lines corroborate the importance of GS1 in maintaining grain protein concentration, as has also been highlighted through identification of QTLs in barley (Fan et al ., ) and via a positive correlation between GS activity and grain protein content in wheat cultivars (Nigro et al ., ; Zhang et al ., ). Considering the fact that extra N supply cannot offset the decline in grain protein concentration of wheat plants growing in an elevated CO 2 environment (Tausz et al ., ; Walker et al ., ), overexpression of HvGS1‐1 may thus provide a means to prevent declining grain protein concentration under elevated atmospheric CO 2 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The amount of N remobilized from vegetative tissues was calculated as the difference between N in vegetative organs (leaves and stems) at flowering and N in those same organs plus chaff (inflorescence minus grains) at maturity, assuming the difference has been translocated into the grains (Tausz et al, ). normalN0.25em()vegetative organs0.25emnormalat0.25emitalicflowering0.25em()normalkg0.25emha1=()italicLeaf tissue0.25em[]N0.25em×0.25emitalicleaf biomass+()italicstem tissue0.25em[]N0.25em×0.25emitalicstem biomass. normalN0.25em()vegetative organs plus chaff0.25emnormalat0.25emitalicmaturity0.25em()normalkg0.25emha1=()italicLeaf tissue0.25em[]N0.25em×0.25emitalicleaf biomass+()italicstem tissue0.25em[]N0.25em×0.25emitalicstem biomass+()italicchaff tissue0.25em[]N0.25em×0.25emitalicchaff biomass. normalN0.25emitalicremobilization0.25em()normalkg0.25emha1=normalN0.25em()vegetative organs0.25emnormalat0.25emitalicfloweringnormalN0.25em()vegetative organs plus chaff0.25emnormalat0.25emitalicmaturity. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%