1999
DOI: 10.1038/16692
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can aposematic signals evolve by gradual change?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
154
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 197 publications
(160 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
154
2
Order By: Relevance
“…My theory differs from earlier theories because it suggests that aposematism should arise relatively rapidly, rather than gradually, which is consistent with the recent experimental findings of Lindström et al (1999b). My approach emphasizes the responses of predators to novel prey types (which may well be shaped to a degree by an ability of predators to generalize from previous experience).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…My theory differs from earlier theories because it suggests that aposematism should arise relatively rapidly, rather than gradually, which is consistent with the recent experimental findings of Lindström et al (1999b). My approach emphasizes the responses of predators to novel prey types (which may well be shaped to a degree by an ability of predators to generalize from previous experience).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 47%
“…Indeed, the function of conspicuousness in warning coloration has previously mainly been attributed to enhancing associative learning (Gittleman & Harvey 1980;Roper & Redston 1987;Schuler & Roper 1992;Alatalo & Mappes 1996;LindstrÎm et al 1999a; but see Figure 1. The mean bias against conspicuous crumbs eaten for all groups in experiment 1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some organisms are protected by defenses that make them unprofitable and advertise their unprofitability to predators with conspicuous warning signals. These organisms are termed 'aposematic' (Wallace 1878, Poulton 1890, Mappes et al 2005) and often use conspicuous colors in their warning signals (e.g., yellow, orange, red combined with black) because such colors are easier for potential predators to learn and remember (Gittleman & Harvey 1980, Roper & Redston 1987, Lindström et al 1999b). This leaves us asking whether it is reasonable to expect that visual warning signals of aposematic organisms should differ in the same way as cryptic prey over geographic space.…”
Section: Geographic Variation For Different Preymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conspicuous warning signals are thought to be better because they are more easily learnt and remembered by potential predators trying to avoid aposematic prey (Gittleman & Harvey 1980, Roper & Redston 1987, Lindström et al 1999b). However, some predators can be unaffected by defenses (Exnerová et al 2003) or be driven by hunger to overcome defenses , Barnett et al 2007) leading aposematic organisms to balance warning signal efficacy with detectability to such predators (Bohlin et al 2008).…”
Section: Trait Trade-offs and Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%