2023
DOI: 10.3390/ruminants3020009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Associative Effects Affect In Vitro Digestibility Estimates Using Artificial Fermenters?

Abstract: We aimed to test the associative effects among forages, and between forage and concentrates on the in vitro digestibility of dry matter and neutral detergent fibre using an artificial ruminal fermentation system. The study consisted of two assays, in which associative effects were evaluated among three forages, sugarcane, maize silage, and Tifton 85 hay under two incubation conditions (single feed or all feeds together in a jar), and the associative effects between sugarcane and soybean meal and/or ground maiz… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 23 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cannulated cattle are generally used to obtain the ruminal inoculum, and even with this method, it is recommended that the animals be adapted to specific diets. According to Camacho et al [35], the rumen microbiology of animals not adapted to diets containing concentrate and forage can be a source of variation for the in vitro analysis of feed digestibility. To avoid sources of variation that affect the ruminal inoculum, sampling should be similar in time and collection method as described by Fortina et al [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cannulated cattle are generally used to obtain the ruminal inoculum, and even with this method, it is recommended that the animals be adapted to specific diets. According to Camacho et al [35], the rumen microbiology of animals not adapted to diets containing concentrate and forage can be a source of variation for the in vitro analysis of feed digestibility. To avoid sources of variation that affect the ruminal inoculum, sampling should be similar in time and collection method as described by Fortina et al [21].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%