2021
DOI: 10.1017/jmo.2021.32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can authentic leaders reduce the spread of negative workplace gossip? The roles of subordinates' perceived procedural justice and interactional justice

Abstract: Many studies suggest that leaders should discourage or prevent the spread of negative workplace gossip (NWG), but yet little is understood about the relationship between leaders and their subordinates' NWG. This study interprets the linkage between authentic leadership and two types of NWG via individuals' perceptions of justice based on fairness heuristic and justice views. The data were collected in a three-stage process from a large information technology corporation in China. The findings revealed that int… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the emotions, attitudes, and actions of leaders can influence the spread of negative emotions. For example, when leaders practice organizational justice (fairness, respect, and clear communication) their teams have lower rates of negative workplace gossip ( Cheng et al, 2021 ). When leaders foster positive working relationships, and instill a sense of vision and pride in their teams, then negative events have less impact on team climate ( Pirola-Merlo et al, 2002 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the emotions, attitudes, and actions of leaders can influence the spread of negative emotions. For example, when leaders practice organizational justice (fairness, respect, and clear communication) their teams have lower rates of negative workplace gossip ( Cheng et al, 2021 ). When leaders foster positive working relationships, and instill a sense of vision and pride in their teams, then negative events have less impact on team climate ( Pirola-Merlo et al, 2002 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, we also propose that IJ can serve as an explanation for the relationship between AL and WL for the following reasons: ALs draw on their own experiences, including thoughts, feelings, needs, wants, preferences and beliefs, acting in ways that are consistent with who they truly are (Harter, 2002). As mentioned earlier, extant literature (Cheng et al, 2022;Li et al, 2014) has found that such AL characteristics can positively affect employee IJ perception. Additionally, given that IJ is expected to be negatively associated with WL, and leaders play some role at different levels of IJ experienced by followers, it is likely that the relationship between AL and WL is mediated by employee IJ perceptions (Boekhorst, 2015;Walumbwa et al, 2008).…”
Section: Mediating Effect Of Interactional Justicementioning
confidence: 78%
“…Moreover, previous studies, such as Cheng et al (2022), Kiersch and Byrne (2015) and Li et al (2014), have indicated that AL is associated with IJ. Based on these arguments, we propose the following hypothesis: H1.…”
Section: Authentic Leadershipmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Sixth, we wanted to explore antecedents of workplace gossip in addition to consequences, but there was too little research on the antecedents of workplace gossip to conduct a meta-analysis. Some studies that employed longitudinal designs to study antecedents of workplace gossip that we identified but could not utilize in the current meta-analysis focused on precursors of workplace gossip such as LMX (Bonner, 2016), abusive supervision (Bonner, 2016; Naeem et al, 2020), authentic leadership (Cheng et al, 2021), self-esteem (Brady et al, 2017), justice (Smit & Montag-Smit, 2019), leader arrogance (De Clercq et al, 2020), organizational norms (Luna & Chou, 2013), and organizational justice perceptions (Cheng et al, 2021).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%