2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejheart.2008.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can B‐type natriuretic peptides replace heart failure risk models?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For cytokines that remain significant in multivariable analysis with NT-proBNP and CRP, the gain in discriminatory power is modest at best. However, the marginal incremental value of inflammatory cytokines in HF progression is not surprising given the limited value even NT-proBNP offers beyond any well-constructed multivariable risk model [59].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Inflammatory Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…For cytokines that remain significant in multivariable analysis with NT-proBNP and CRP, the gain in discriminatory power is modest at best. However, the marginal incremental value of inflammatory cytokines in HF progression is not surprising given the limited value even NT-proBNP offers beyond any well-constructed multivariable risk model [59].…”
Section: Evaluation Of Inflammatory Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, in spite of their prognostic power, even the use of natriuretic peptides has limitations related to poor performance in certain demographics, such as patients with obesity and renal impairment, as well as the interpretation of midrange "gray-zone" levels [58]. In addition, the natriuretic peptides do not reflect all underlying pathological processes in the failing myocardium, and only modestly improve well-constructed multivariable risk models [59]. Indeed, measurement of hs-cTn provides significant prognostic information independent of NT-proBNP in chronic HF, and simultaneous measurement of hs-cTn and NT-proBNP improves mortality risk stratification in these patients [15][16][17].…”
Section: Current Circulating Biomarkers In Hfmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The states of hyponatremia, 11 anemia, 12 hypoalbuminemia, 13 and excessive circulating cytokine levels 14 all show independent association with worsened survival. B‐type natriuretic peptides (BNPs) have probably received the most attention in the recent literature as a single laboratory biomarker of outcome 15–18 . The quartile of patients with the lowest N‐terminal pro–brain natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) levels in the placebo arm of the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (Val‐HeFT) had less than one third the mortality (7.8%) of patients in the highest quartile of NT‐proBNP (25.3%) 19 .…”
Section: What Makes a Good Prognostic Model?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…B-type natriuretic peptides (BNPs) have probably received the most attention in the recent literature as a single laboratory biomarker of outcome. [15][16][17][18] The quartile of patients with the lowest N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels in the placebo arm of the Valsartan Heart Failure Trial (Val-HeFT) had less than one third the mortality (7.8%) of patients in the highest quartile of NT-proBNP (25.3%). 19 In addition, change in BNP level provided additional prognostic information over the value at a single point in time.…”
Section: What Makes a Good Prognostic Model?mentioning
confidence: 99%