2020
DOI: 10.1111/ele.13658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can biomass distribution across trophic levels predict trophic cascades?

Abstract: The biomass distribution across trophic levels (biomass pyramid) and cascading responses to perturbations (trophic cascades) are archetypal representatives of the interconnected set of static and dynamical properties of food chains. A vast literature has explored their respective ecological drivers, sometimes generating correlations between them. Here we instead reveal a fundamental connection: both pyramids and cascades reflect the dynamical sensitivity of the food chain to changes in species intrinsic rates.… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Estimations for how much production is lost to self-regulation are basically non-existent. It has been suggested that self-regulation and predation coefficients are roughly proportional for predators (Polis et al, 1989;Galiana et al, 2021). Assuming self-regulation and predation coefficients as equal (r C = q C ), renders self-regulation fractions of ρ CC = 1.0 for the aquatic and ρ CC = 0.067 for the terrestrial ecosystem (see calculation in the Parameter derivation subsection).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Estimations for how much production is lost to self-regulation are basically non-existent. It has been suggested that self-regulation and predation coefficients are roughly proportional for predators (Polis et al, 1989;Galiana et al, 2021). Assuming self-regulation and predation coefficients as equal (r C = q C ), renders self-regulation fractions of ρ CC = 1.0 for the aquatic and ρ CC = 0.067 for the terrestrial ecosystem (see calculation in the Parameter derivation subsection).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsidies provided from below, by influx of nutrients or direct provision to primary producers, propagates up to consumer species, increasing the overall biomass and altering the shape of biomass distribution in the food web (Hines et al, 2006). Predator subsidies lead to pressure on the herbivores they consume, and can lead to trophic cascades where primary producers are released from herbivory pressure due to predation (Leroux and Loreau, 2008;Newsome et al, 2015;Galiana et al, 2021). Hence, subsidies can cause positive albeit indirect effects on primary production via trophic interactions, but outcomes of such combined horizontal and vertical effects of subsidies in green-brown food webs are poorly explored.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimations for how much production is lost to self-regulation are virtually nonexistent. It has been suggested that for predators, self-regulation and predation coefficients are roughly proportional (Polis et al, 1989;Galiana et al, 2021). Assuming self-regulation and predation coefficients as equal (r C = q C ), renders self-regulation fractions of ρ CC = 1.0 for the aquatic and ρ CC = 0.067 for the terrestrial ecosystem (see calculation in the Parameter derivation subsection).…”
Section: Data Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsidization from below, by influx of nutrients or direct subsidization of primary producers, propagates up to consumer species, increasing the overall biomass and the shape of biomass distribution in the food web (Hines et al, 2006). Input of predators leads to pressure on the herbivores they consume, and can lead to trophic cascades where primary producers are released from herbivory pressure due to predation (Leroux & Loreau, 2008;Newsome et al, 2015;Galiana et al, 2021). Hence, subsidies can cause positive albeit indirect effects on primary production via trophic interactions, but outcomes of such combined horizontal and vertical effects of subsidies in green-brown food webs are poorly explored .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, food webs often involve many less edible plants (Oksanen & Oksanen 2000) or anti-predative herbivores (Degerman et al 2018), which can significantly hamper vertical energy flow to apex predators (Stiboret al 2004). Inefficiency in energy transfer can significantly influence the biomass distribution of food webs (de Ruiter et al1995;McCauley et al 2018;Barbier & Loreau 2019) and thereby alter the strength of trophic cascades (Heath et al 2014;Galiana et al 2021). In particular, too low energy transfer may decouple biomass production at higher trophic levels from primary production, violating assumptions underlying the productivity hypothesis (Brett & Goldman 1997;Davis et al2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%