2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.biosystems.2009.04.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can biophysics tell us something about the weak equivalence principle vis a vis the thought experiment of Einstein involving human subjects?

Abstract: Over a period of several decades it has been noticed that most astronauts, either orbiting the earth or on trips to the moon, have observed phosphenes or light flashes (LF) including streaks, spots and clouds of light when their eyes are closed or they are in a darkened cabin. Scientists suspect that two separate components of cosmic rays cause these flashes due to direct interaction with the retina. This phenomenon is not noticed on the ground because of cosmic ray interaction with the atmosphere. The argumen… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 22 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Einstein said that he first got his idea of the equivalence principle one day when it came to him that falling in earth's gravity would be the equivalent of floating in space while undergoing uniform motion, and that there would be no way to distinguish between the two if one was inside a closed container conducting only internal measurements. The author had raised the question in a previous paper about the validity of this reasoning in view of recent experiments on earth and in space showing the appearance of phosphenes or flashes of light in the retina of astronauts in space as a result of interaction with cosmic rays and no phosphenes for humans shielded on earth [21].…”
Section: Are Falling and Floating Equivalent In The Weak Principle Of Equivalence?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Einstein said that he first got his idea of the equivalence principle one day when it came to him that falling in earth's gravity would be the equivalent of floating in space while undergoing uniform motion, and that there would be no way to distinguish between the two if one was inside a closed container conducting only internal measurements. The author had raised the question in a previous paper about the validity of this reasoning in view of recent experiments on earth and in space showing the appearance of phosphenes or flashes of light in the retina of astronauts in space as a result of interaction with cosmic rays and no phosphenes for humans shielded on earth [21].…”
Section: Are Falling and Floating Equivalent In The Weak Principle Of Equivalence?mentioning
confidence: 99%