Aust J Gen Pract 2018
DOI: 10.31128/ajgp-06-18-4618
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can continuity of care in primary care be sustained in the modern health system?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There are three principle possible explanations. First, it may be related to poor access to care, whereby patients with multiple chronic conditions are getting treatment for their conditions (perhaps from a pharmacy) but there is a lack of access to care from the primary care system [54][55][56][57]. It could also relate to cost, such as a lack of comprehensive universal coverage fee at the point of care [36,[58][59][60].…”
Section: Clinical and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There are three principle possible explanations. First, it may be related to poor access to care, whereby patients with multiple chronic conditions are getting treatment for their conditions (perhaps from a pharmacy) but there is a lack of access to care from the primary care system [54][55][56][57]. It could also relate to cost, such as a lack of comprehensive universal coverage fee at the point of care [36,[58][59][60].…”
Section: Clinical and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In reality, the problem may be a combination of these three possibilities. Primary healthcare clinicians need to improve the follow up on patients, in order to assess possible discontinuation of certain treatments due to adverse drug events, and the financial constraints that limit patients' ability to go for follow up check-ups and refilling prescriptions [36,56,57]. Another clinical implication is on prioritising NCDs, whereby clinicians should assess NCD profiles of patients, prioritise treatment for patients who would have the greatest clinical benefit of better management and control, and consider personal preferences of patients for managing various NCDs [6,[66][67][68].…”
Section: Clinical and Policy Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4,5,17,44 Healthcare systems in LMICs like China may need to implement policies that improve access to care from the primary care system for continual treatment after rst diagnosis. [48][49][50][51] Policies that prioritise NCD combinations that include mental health conditions that are more prevalent or associated with poorer management and control need be considered, such as reducing costs of medicines and clinic visits. 35,52 It is worth noting that health-care delivery in China is hospital-centered and fragmented, with little coordination among health-care providers across different tiers of the system 53 .…”
Section: Comparison With Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent systematic review of continuity of care demonstrated that it is associated with lower mortality rates, perhaps via some of the mechanisms mentioned above. There is a strong perception that the current health system, which includes many part‐time doctors, discourages continuity, although part‐timers may actually be preferred by patients in some cases . An acknowledgement of the importance of continuity through the system (eg, by patient identification of their own GP and potentially voluntary enrolment with a regular GP) might benefit patients and overall health expenditure.…”
Section: Coordination and Continuity Of Carementioning
confidence: 99%