2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can controlled-release urea replace the split application of normal urea in China? A meta-analysis based on crop grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
36
2

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
2
36
2
Order By: Relevance
“…B. et al, 2021 ). This study contradicts our findings, suggesting that the effect of the combination of controlled-release and conventional urea on microbial diversity may be influenced by regional conditions, such as nutrient availability or changes in the crop fertility stage ( Figure 2 ; Zhang et al, 2022 ). For example, when nutrient availability in the soil decreases or when reduced nutrient levels may limit microbial proliferation and nutrient mineralization, competition between crops and microbes for N may reduce microbial diversity ( Inselsbacher et al, 2010 ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…B. et al, 2021 ). This study contradicts our findings, suggesting that the effect of the combination of controlled-release and conventional urea on microbial diversity may be influenced by regional conditions, such as nutrient availability or changes in the crop fertility stage ( Figure 2 ; Zhang et al, 2022 ). For example, when nutrient availability in the soil decreases or when reduced nutrient levels may limit microbial proliferation and nutrient mineralization, competition between crops and microbes for N may reduce microbial diversity ( Inselsbacher et al, 2010 ).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…This result suggests that SU3 treatment is more effective in improving N agronomic efficiency and N partial factor productivity than CT and other treatments. This is probably because this favorable ratio of controlled-release to regular urea both avoids rapid N losses and matches the fertilizer requirements of the maize growth stage, thus improving the N agronomic efficiency and N partial factor productivity ( Zhang et al, 2022 ). Therefore, those results suggest that a 3:7 (SU3) blend of controlled-release urea and regular urea is the best ratio that maximizes summer maize yields and N agronomic efficiency in the North China Plain (Hebei Province).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Developing new types of urea, such as environmentally friendly nitrogen [15] and controlled-release urea (CRU) [16], and overcoming the easy volatilization and leaching of urea, are likely the most feasible ways to promote both grain yield and nitrogen use efficiency [17,18]. Recently, CRU, which was designed to prolong nutrient release duration to better match crop nutrient uptake, combined with a one-time basal application method, has been widely used in China [19,20]. However, the cost of CRU is basically higher than that of conventional urea and seems too costly for cereal production.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The yield and NAE of the fourth-split urea application were stable, but at low levels. This could be due to the fact that multiple applications of urea ensured the N supply in the key growth periods of wheat to some extent, but its characteristics of rapid evaporation and easy loss limited its full effect [43]. The effects of different fertilization patterns on the soil-available N in different ecological regions and its regulation mechanism on wheat growth will be further discussed in subsequent studies.…”
Section: Assessment Of Environmental Adaptability Of Different Fertil...mentioning
confidence: 99%