2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2009.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can corporate governance deter management from manipulating earnings? Evidence from related-party sales transactions in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
188
3
13

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 294 publications
(223 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
19
188
3
13
Order By: Relevance
“…First, for many Chinese listed companies, the ultimate controlling shareholder is the Chinese government, which influences company management through its shareholding and political power (Liu and Lu, 2007;Lo et al, 2010). As such, managers of government-controlled firms may have different tax incentives compared with their counterparts in the private sector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, for many Chinese listed companies, the ultimate controlling shareholder is the Chinese government, which influences company management through its shareholding and political power (Liu and Lu, 2007;Lo et al, 2010). As such, managers of government-controlled firms may have different tax incentives compared with their counterparts in the private sector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…the ownership structure and corporate control. In particular, many studies focus on the relationship between ownership structure (Jian & Tak, 2010;Kun, 2005;Munir, 2010;Zengquan, Sun, & Wang, 2004), the role played by the stock market (Gordon et al, 2004;Lo, Wong, & Firth, 2010;Yeh, Shu, & Su, 2012) and the quality and relevance of RPTs in corporate life. Cernat (2004) argues that CG represents not only a crucial difference between varieties of capitalism but is also a major factor in determining their economic performance.…”
Section: Literature Review Of Rptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is because the "substance-over-form" issues are common with RPTs and some RPTs are embedded in documentation that is less clear or thorough than the documentation that ordinarily exists between unrelated parties. Reference [9] find that while relevant tax law and regulations specify that prices for RP sales should be set according to market prices as used in arm"s length transactions, practices may not be so. There is a possibility that transfer prices is treated as a mechanism to transfer resources between different stakeholders for the purpose of giving gains to some and losses to others.…”
Section: Accounting Irregularities In Rptsmentioning
confidence: 99%