2020
DOI: 10.1177/1352458519871818
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can CSF biomarkers predict future MS disease activity and severity?

Abstract: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a heterogeneous disease. With several disease modifying treatments of different mechanisms of action in use now and in development, it is important to identify reliable biomarkers to identify those higher risk MS patients in whom stronger but riskier treatments might be used, as well as to identify those for whom safer treatments of lower efficacy would be sufficient. Here we review cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and blood biomarkers that show promise for differentiating people with MS wh… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to other CSF biomarkers thought to reflect activity or damage associated with MS pathology and released into the CSF, 38 PVALB is most likely released into the CSF as a consequence of interneuronal loss. Compared to Nf‐L, our results show that CSF PVALB levels correlate better with cortical thinning and cognitive impairment than Nf‐L and also earlier, at the time of diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Similar to other CSF biomarkers thought to reflect activity or damage associated with MS pathology and released into the CSF, 38 PVALB is most likely released into the CSF as a consequence of interneuronal loss. Compared to Nf‐L, our results show that CSF PVALB levels correlate better with cortical thinning and cognitive impairment than Nf‐L and also earlier, at the time of diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…However, the study also observed that higher accuracy in the diagnosis between AD patients and MCI patients was seen when combining the latter biomarkers with NfL 33 . Similarly, higher levels of biomarkers such as GFAP and YKL-40 are correlated with increased MS disease progression while NfL determined changes in brain volume and neuronal injury 34 . NfL was also found to have accurate diagnostic value in neurodegenerative dementias when used in conjunction with tau 35 .…”
Section: Neurofilament Light With Other Biomarkersmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In the control group (tumor-free), only one out of eight patients (13%) with idiopathic intracranial hypertension exhibited BBB dysfunction. For the MS patient group, we did not calculate CSF/serum quotients of albumin, IgG, IgA and IgM concentration as the CSF contains inherently more IgG [18]. This high degree of BBB dysfunction in the analyzed clinical entries underlined the necessity to consider leakage of plasma proteins into the CSF to avoid the selection of false-positive candidate biomarkers for further validation.…”
Section: Analysis Of Bbb Dysfunction In the Discovery Cohortmentioning
confidence: 99%