Can customer participation promote hospitality frontline employees’ extra-role service behavior?

Abstract

Purpose Drawing on and extending the socially embedded model of thriving, this paper aims to investigate how and when customer participation promotes hospitality frontline employees’ engagement in extra-role service behavior. Design/methodology/approach A two-wave questionnaire survey was carried out among frontline service employees and their immediate supervisors in a four-star business hotel in Eastern China. Path analysis using Mplus 8.3 examined a multilevel moderated mediation model. Findings Customer participation has a positive effect on frontline employees’ experience of thriving, which in turn promotes their engagement in extra-role service behavior. Nevertheless, supervisors’ negative affect weakens the positive effect of customer participation. Practical implications Hotels could implement employee assistance programs, arrange training on emotional regulation and positive psychology and create a fun work environment to help alleviate supervisors’ experience of negative affect so as to lessen its adverse effect on frontline employees’ perception of customer participation. Originality/value First, this work is one of the few studies exploring how customer participation affects frontline employees’ well-being (in terms of thriving) and extra-role service behavior, which advances extant value co-creation literature. Second, the moderating role of supervisors’ negative affect enriches the limited understanding of when customer participation might not bring firm benefits. Third, by uncovering customer participation as an antecedent of employee thriving, this study extends thriving research that only attends to contexts located within organizations.

The effect of illegitimate tasks on hospitality employees’ service performance: a conservation of resources perspective

“…We controlled for employee gender, age, education and organizational tenure, which have been shown to be influential in employee service performance (Cheng et al , 2020; Ye et al , 2019). Moreover, because our data were collected from three hotels, we created two dummy variables to control for hotel effects.…”

“…Employees with high thriving at work feel that their current experiences are motivating and supportive of personal development and growth (Kleine et al, 2019), experience a greater number positive feelings and invest more time and energy in their work. Indeed, thriving at work is associated with health and well-being, positive job attitudes, high job performance (Goh et al, 2022) and extra-role behaviors (Xu et al, 2022).…”

From empowering leadership to proactive work behavior in hospitality: a study of multiple cross-level mediation processes

“…These traits and states are valid for strengthening the positive mindset for psychological capital (Avey et al , 2010a) and have been tested conceptually and empirically (Avey et al , 2010b). With practical strategies to leverage one's psychological capital, the individual could thus develop methods and approaches to deal with workplace stress from positive resources of hope, optimism, self-efficacy and resilience (Xu et al , 2023; Zia et al , 2022). These types of empowering leaders help organize a participative and collaborative environment to encourage employees' commitment and responsibility regarding work performance, thus fostering optimal outcomes of positive behavior among individuals and groups in the workplace.…”

Service agents’ risk behavior and implications for co-creation

“…Understandably, high-end interactions between agents and customers are more frequent, if not ubiquitous, in full-service hotels. Recently, variations in the conceptualization and enactment of co-creation have advanced studies of hospitality consumers’ perceptions of service-robot (automated) services in restaurants in China (Zhang et al , 2022); factors influencing co-creation in peer-to-peer platforms (Foroudi et al , 2022); a broader narrative on the service-dominant (S-D) logic impact on positive customer outcomes (Li et al , 2022); a customized travel service context (Li et al , 2022); the extension of a socially embedded model of thriving on customer participation (Xu et al , 2022); and the influencing factors of employees’ brand sabotage behavior as a moderating mechanism on perceptual justice (Peng et al , 2021). More extensive literature reviews (Kandampully et al , 2018; So et al , 2021; Carvalho and Alves, 2022) indicate both the breadth and depth of the current research in the hospitality literature, which offers extensive examinations of the construct, customer behaviors and factors that impact the co-creation process.…”