2014
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.2530109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Deregulation Improve Analyst Informativeness? Evidence from the JOBS Act.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 150 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, the IPO firms grappled with increased IPO underpricing, suggesting a rise in information uncertainty-a sentiment echoed by Barth et al (2017). Furthermore, Dambra et al (2018) highlighted that the Act's provisions inadvertently led analysts to offer more optimistic, albeit less accurate, IPO coverage. This optimism was intricately linked to post-IPO trading volume and IPO pricing, hinting at potential conflicts of interest.…”
Section: Regulatory Developments and Their Impact On Ipo Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Instead, the IPO firms grappled with increased IPO underpricing, suggesting a rise in information uncertainty-a sentiment echoed by Barth et al (2017). Furthermore, Dambra et al (2018) highlighted that the Act's provisions inadvertently led analysts to offer more optimistic, albeit less accurate, IPO coverage. This optimism was intricately linked to post-IPO trading volume and IPO pricing, hinting at potential conflicts of interest.…”
Section: Regulatory Developments and Their Impact On Ipo Practicesmentioning
confidence: 99%