2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can differences in learning strategies explain the benefits of learning from static and dynamic visualizations?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
43
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is remarkable, considering that the DCVs only took them about 3 min to complete and the average amount of time a student needs to finish the osmosis assessment portion of the entire survey was 47 min. The finding resonates with Kühl et al's (2011) study that dynamic visualization condition outperformed those with text-only condition. In addition, the time spent on watching DCV (T DCV ) contributes significantly to the student's osmosis understanding.…”
Section: Student Feedbacksupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This result is remarkable, considering that the DCVs only took them about 3 min to complete and the average amount of time a student needs to finish the osmosis assessment portion of the entire survey was 47 min. The finding resonates with Kühl et al's (2011) study that dynamic visualization condition outperformed those with text-only condition. In addition, the time spent on watching DCV (T DCV ) contributes significantly to the student's osmosis understanding.…”
Section: Student Feedbacksupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Some of these moderating factors include learners' processing resources, prior knowledge or ability, the relationship between the verbal and visual information, and the difficulty of the problem (e.g., Kalyuga, Chandler, & Sweller, 1998Kühl, Scheiter, Gerjets, & Gemballa, 2011;Sung & Mayer, 2012;van Merriënboer & Sweller, 2005).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study by Owens [5] showed a decrease in students' performance when animation was used as a supplementary material to traditional instructional methods. Kuhl et al [30] compared efficiency of learning using static versus dynamic instructional tools and observed no difference. Gerjets and Scheiter [31] and Paas et al [32] argue that 3-D animations lead to a cognitive overload and, subsequently, a decrease in learning.…”
Section: European Alliance For Innovationmentioning
confidence: 99%