2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.08.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can economic assets increase girls' risk of sexual harassment? Evaluation results from a social, health and economic asset-building intervention for vulnerable adolescent girls in Uganda

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
64
0
3

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(68 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
64
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…age: 41.09227 women; 2-year follow-up; pre-test, post-test; no randomisation* Reduction in number of sexual partners in past week ( p  < 0.001)* Reduction in number of casual partners ( p  = 0.098)* Reduction in number of regular partners ( p  < 0.001)* No impact on condom use with casual partners ( p  = 0.727)* Increase in condom use with regular partners ( p  = 0.031) Witte et al [64]34-session HIV sexual risk reduction intervention; microfinance; vocational trainingMongoliaFemale sex workers; av. age 36107 women randomised into intervention or control; clusters 3- and 6-month follow-up* Reduction in number of paying sexual partners ( p  < 0.001)* 3.72 times more likely to report no unprotected vaginal sex acts at 6 months ( p  < 0.05)  Savings and gender transformative Austrian and Muthengi [65]Safe spaces; reproductive health training; financial education; savings accountsUgandaGirls 10–23; majority under 191159 of which 451 received full intervention; 300 savings only; 311 control; 12-month follow-up; delivery error led to natural randomisation * No impact on indecent touching in full intervention, but in economic-only arm significant increase ( p  < 0.01)Austrian and Muthengi [66]Safe spaces; reproductive health training; financial education; savings accountsKenya; UgandaGirls 10–191473 in Kenya; 1564 in Uganda; 18-month follow-up; comparison groups * In Kenya no impact on indecently touched in past 6 months* Significant decrease in being indecently touched in past 6 months in Uganda Vocational strengthening and gender transformative interventions  Dunbar et al [67]SHAZ! reproductive health services; life skills-based HIV education; vocational training and microgrants; integrated social supportZimbabweAdolescent female orphans (having lostat least one parent) aged 16 to 19315 randomly assigned to intervention or control; 24-month follow-up* No difference in sexual debut*Reduction in transactional sex (Intervention Odds Ratio [I.O.R] = 0.64; 95% C.I 0.50–0.83)* Increased likelihood of using condom (I.O.R = 1.79; 95% C.I 1.23–2.62)* Reduction in violence (I.O.R = 0.10 vs Control Odds Ratio [C.O.R] = 0.63; p  = 0.06)Jewkes et al [68]Stepping St...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…age: 41.09227 women; 2-year follow-up; pre-test, post-test; no randomisation* Reduction in number of sexual partners in past week ( p  < 0.001)* Reduction in number of casual partners ( p  = 0.098)* Reduction in number of regular partners ( p  < 0.001)* No impact on condom use with casual partners ( p  = 0.727)* Increase in condom use with regular partners ( p  = 0.031) Witte et al [64]34-session HIV sexual risk reduction intervention; microfinance; vocational trainingMongoliaFemale sex workers; av. age 36107 women randomised into intervention or control; clusters 3- and 6-month follow-up* Reduction in number of paying sexual partners ( p  < 0.001)* 3.72 times more likely to report no unprotected vaginal sex acts at 6 months ( p  < 0.05)  Savings and gender transformative Austrian and Muthengi [65]Safe spaces; reproductive health training; financial education; savings accountsUgandaGirls 10–23; majority under 191159 of which 451 received full intervention; 300 savings only; 311 control; 12-month follow-up; delivery error led to natural randomisation * No impact on indecent touching in full intervention, but in economic-only arm significant increase ( p  < 0.01)Austrian and Muthengi [66]Safe spaces; reproductive health training; financial education; savings accountsKenya; UgandaGirls 10–191473 in Kenya; 1564 in Uganda; 18-month follow-up; comparison groups * In Kenya no impact on indecently touched in past 6 months* Significant decrease in being indecently touched in past 6 months in Uganda Vocational strengthening and gender transformative interventions  Dunbar et al [67]SHAZ! reproductive health services; life skills-based HIV education; vocational training and microgrants; integrated social supportZimbabweAdolescent female orphans (having lostat least one parent) aged 16 to 19315 randomly assigned to intervention or control; 24-month follow-up* No difference in sexual debut*Reduction in transactional sex (Intervention Odds Ratio [I.O.R] = 0.64; 95% C.I 0.50–0.83)* Increased likelihood of using condom (I.O.R = 1.79; 95% C.I 1.23–2.62)* Reduction in violence (I.O.R = 0.10 vs Control Odds Ratio [C.O.R] = 0.63; p  = 0.06)Jewkes et al [68]Stepping St...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only one discrete intervention was identified that reported a behavioural outcome in two studies [65,66]. This focused on young women and included a pilot from two countries (Kenya and Uganda) using a pre-test, post-test design [66] and a subsequent larger study from Uganda, with three arms: full treatment, economic-only treatment and comparison group [65].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Of the 82 studies falling into this KB2 category, eight studies measured normative change. The social norms in question were primarily around sex, condom usage and gender (see for example Austrian and Muthengi 2014;.…”
Section: Figure 2: Number Of Completed Impact Evaluations By Intervenmentioning
confidence: 99%