Can Economic Assistance Shape Combatant Support in Wartime? Experimental Evidence from Afghanistan

Abstract

Governments, militaries, and aid organizations all rely on economic interventions to shape civilian attitudes toward combatants during wartime. We have, however, little individual-level evidence that these “hearts and minds” programs actually influence combatant support. We address this problem by conducting a factorial randomized control trial of two common interventions—vocational training and cash transfers—on combatant support among 2,597 at-risk youth in Kandahar, Afghanistan. We find that training only improved economic livelihoods modestly and had little effect on combatant support. Cash failed to lift incomes, producing a boom-and-bust dynamic in which pro-government sentiment initially spiked and then quickly reversed itself, leaving a residue of increased Taliban support. Conditional on training, cash failed to improve beneficiaries’ livelihoods but did increase support for the Afghan government for at least eight months after the intervention. These findings suggest that aid affects attitudes by providing information about government resolve and competence rather than by improving economic livelihoods.

Can Appeals For Peace Promote Tolerance and Mitigate Support for Extremism? Evidence from an Experiment with Adolescents in Burkina Faso

“…This study thus contributes to a growing literature which raises questions about the effectiveness of commonly-used policy measures aimed at increasing social cohesion and reducing violence, particularly when international interventions fail to tailor programs to local contexts (Autesserre 2015;Barma 2016;Swedlund 2017;Campbell 2018). Our findings are in line with recent research showing that programs designed to counter violent extremism may backfire and inadvertently benefit armed groups (Lyall, Zhou and Imai 2020;Mitts 2021). They also complement research highlighting the conditional effectiveness of foreign aid by ethnicity and research probing the relationship between foreign aid and sustainable peace (Lyall, Shiraito and Imai 2015;Arriola and Grossman 2021).…”

Peacekeeping and the Enforcement of Intergroup Cooperation: Evidence from Mali

“…The results further imply that residents of post-conflict settings may reject the presence of some international actors more than others and that this may have real effects on peacekeeping outcomes. This article extends existing research on the conditions under which the international community can reduce the fragility of post-conflict settings (Beath et al 2012;Crost et al 2014;Sexton 2016;Lyall et al 2020). The findings of this study suggest that peacekeepers, deployed with the explicit mandate to enforce peaceful interactions within civilian communities, can promote intergroup cooperation in weakly institutionalized settings.…”

Peace is in the Eye of the Beholder: How Perceptions of Impartiality Shape Peacekeeping Outcomes

“…This article extends existing research on the conditions under which the international community can help stabilize fragile settings (Beath, Christia and Enikolopov 2013;Sexton 2016;Lyall, Zhou and Imai 2020). My research shows that UN peacekeeping substantially mitigates the impact of such violence.…”