2003
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1833310100
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can energy landscape roughness of proteins and RNA be measured by using mechanical unfolding experiments?

Abstract: By considering temperature effects on the mechanical unfolding rates of proteins and RNA, whose energy landscape is rugged, the question posed in the title is answered in the affirmative. Adopting a theory by Zwanzig [Zwanzig, R. (1988) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85, 2029 -2030], we show that, because of roughness characterized by an energy scale , the unfolding rate at constant force is retarded. Similarly, in nonequilibrium experiments done at constant loading rates, the most probable unfolding force increas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
140
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 160 publications
(144 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
4
140
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nonnative attractions are expected to affect the roughness of the energy landscape (53)(54)(55)(56). To explore the effects of nonnative attractive interactions on the folding dynamics, we add recently published amino acid pair potentials developed for proteinprotein interactions (57) on top of the original Gō-like model for native interactions (see SI Text).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonnative attractions are expected to affect the roughness of the energy landscape (53)(54)(55)(56). To explore the effects of nonnative attractive interactions on the folding dynamics, we add recently published amino acid pair potentials developed for proteinprotein interactions (57) on top of the original Gō-like model for native interactions (see SI Text).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This value contrasts with the much higher value ‡ ϭ 4 ϫ 10 9 s Ϫ1 that we obtained in the mechanical experiments. The lower values obtained in classical biochemistry assays have often been explained in terms of Kramers' theory (58 -60), which relates the rate at which the protein diffuses to the transition state (52,(61)(62)(63) under high friction conditions. Both the TST and the Kramers' formalisms share the Arrhenius exponential term.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, single-molecule techniques have been used to probe features of the energy landscape of proteins and RNA that are not easily accessible in ensemble experiments (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18). It is possible to construct the shape of the energy landscape, including the energy scales of ruggedness (19,20), by using dynamical trajectories that are generated by applying a constant force ( f ) to the ends of proteins and RNA (14,15,21,22). If the observation time is long enough for the molecule to sample the accessible conformational space, then the time average of an observable X recorded for the ␣th molecule [͗X͘ ϭ t3ϱ lim ( 1 t )͐ 0 t d X ␣ ( )] should equal the ensemble average (͗X͘ ϭ t3ϱ…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%