Can Environmental Regulations Promote Greenhouse Gas Abatement in OECD Countries? Command-and-Control vs. Market-Based Policies

Abstract

In response to global warming, greenhouse gas (GHG) abatement has been one of the top priorities of governments, and a large variety of environmental regulation policies have been implemented in past decades. Using panel data from 27 OECD countries over the period of 2005–2012, this study measures and compares the stringency level of command-and-control and market-based environmental regulations. The differentiated impacts and indirect effects of environmental regulations on GHG emissions are tested empirically. The results show that: (1) Both command-and-control and market-based environmental regulations have effects on GHG abatement in OECD countries, and there is a non-linear relationship between environmental regulations and GHG discharge, in which stringent command-and-control environmental regulations and mild market-based regulation policies are preferred; (2) Command-and-control environmental regulations reduce GHG emissions by improving the technological level, rather than the energy consumption structure. In contrast, market-based environmental regulations can promote GHG abatement through the intermediary effects of both technological progress and the energy consumption structure. The findings provide implications for OECD countries to further reduce GHG emissions.

Impact of Environmental Regulation on Corporate Green Technological Innovation: The Moderating Role of Corporate Governance and Environmental Information Disclosure

“…ERs can be categorized into command and control, market incentives, voluntary participation approaches [31][32][33], formal versus informal environmental regulations [34,35], and other classifications. Various environmental rules utilize distinct environmental regulating tools; for example, emission fees and the promulgation of emission standards are used under command-control environmental regulations [36], and market-incentive environmental rules utilize incentives like tax rebates, environmental subsidies, and emissions trading [37]. Various environmental regulations differ, and failing to account for this diversity may lead to biased research results [38].…”

Environmental Rule of Law: Tracking Progress and Charting Future Directions

“…Some scholars have argued that legal frameworks that set up decentralized or community-based environmental management systems can result in higher levels of compliance and better outcomes than centralized 'fortress' conservation measures (Zhang and Li 2020). Laws that employ market-based measures, like environmental taxes or incentives, can be effective alongside command-and-control measures (Blackman, Li and Liu 2018;Guo et al 2021). Some of the most innovative legal mechanisms currently in development put some of the burden and cost of implementation and enforcement on private entities.…”

The impact of environmental regulation on regional economic growth: A case study of the Yangtze River Economic Belt, China

“…On the basis of covering a variety of environmental regulations, this study considers the timeliness of environmental regulations, introduces a lag period of environmental regulations, and investigates the dynamic effects of environmental regulations on regional ecological efficiency. Guo et al [ 8 ] compared the impact of CAC environmental regulations and MI environmental regulations on greenhouse gas emission reduction. He believes that stricter CAC environmental regulations and moderate MI environmental regulations are favored.…”