1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf00396329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can extensional viscosity be measured with opposed-nozzle devices?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0
4

Year Published

1998
1998
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
28
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, severe problems in the quantitative correlation of the material functions determined with the opposed jet device [61] have led to other methods for studying extensional flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, severe problems in the quantitative correlation of the material functions determined with the opposed jet device [61] have led to other methods for studying extensional flows.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the relaxation time λ was measured by CaBER. λ of PEO Tr of dilute or semidilute polymer solution can be high 8,26,27) . Therefore, we considered that η ex and Tr obtained in the present study were in reasonable range.…”
Section: Extensional Rate Obtained From Velocity Profilesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast with polymer melts, it is difficult to apply stable uniaxial extensional stress to polymer solution. Since the early 1990, several methods to measure extensional properties of the fluids were proposed [5][6][7][8] . The filament stretching extensional rheometer (FiSER) 9) and the capillary breakup extensional rheometer (CaBER) [10][11][12] are the pioneering work of the extensional viscosity measurement of polymer solutions with capillary thinning technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various technical approaches have been developed for the measurement of this material function and the results compared in order to assess the merits and disadvantages of each approach so that a standard procedure could be selected (Hudson and Jones [29] and the projects S1 and M1). A final answer to this problem is coming out slowly, but it is clear that in the short term, the outcome will not be a method as accurate as that used for the measurement of the viscometric viscosity, as the paper of Dontula et al [30] on the shortcomings of the opposed-jet technique shows.…”
Section: The Elongational 6iscosity Of Drag Reducing Fluidsmentioning
confidence: 99%