2011
DOI: 10.1080/0312407x.2010.508841
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Family-Focussed Interventions Improve Problematic Substance Use in Aboriginal Communities? A Role for Social Work

Abstract: Problematic substance use is a significant concern for Aboriginal communities across Australia. Most approaches to intervention are individualised, locating the problem and the solution in the substance user. When problematic use is common within a family and community, individual treatment is likely to be ineffective. A literature review of familyfocussed and culturally specific drug and alcohol interventions was conducted to inform the development of family-focussed interventions in the community setting. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some social work studies have critically examined individualised approaches to drug and alcohol intervention that locate the problem and the solution within the substance user. For example, scholars emphasise the need for family-focussed and culturally specific drug and alcohol interventions, especially for First Nation communities (Munro and Allan, 2011). This includes examining individual and group ‘treatment’ outcomes for Aboriginal and Non-Aboriginal women (Allan and Kemp, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some social work studies have critically examined individualised approaches to drug and alcohol intervention that locate the problem and the solution within the substance user. For example, scholars emphasise the need for family-focussed and culturally specific drug and alcohol interventions, especially for First Nation communities (Munro and Allan, 2011). This includes examining individual and group ‘treatment’ outcomes for Aboriginal and Non-Aboriginal women (Allan and Kemp, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For individuals in the general population seeking treatment, cognitive-behavioral and motivational enhancement therapy (Copeland et al, 2014) and contingency management (Copeland & Swift, 2009), with treatment for concurrent substance misuse (Banbury et al, 2013;Copeland & Swift, 2009), can support cannabis cessation. In contrast with tobacco smoking, where a focus on individual behavior (Marley et al, 2014), supported in health clinics (Eades, Sanson-Fisher, & Panaretto, 2013), could be effective when oriented towards groups and families (McCalman et al, 2012;Munro & Allan, 2011), few studies have addressed cannabis demand and harm reduction or treatment strategies for Indigenous Australians (Bohanna, Bird, Copeland, Roberts, & Clough, 2014;. To plan for harm reduction approaches and treatments in such settings, improved understandings of the specific social and attitudinal context of substance misuse are essential (Pawson, 2006;Poland, Frohlich, & Cargo, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is no simple way to reduce the burden of substance-related harm experienced by Aboriginal Australians [8] and, as such, a range of effective and culturally safe approaches are required. Gray et al [9] identify appropriate strategies including: acute treatment (sobering-up centres, detoxification) [10]; counselling and residential treatment [11][12][13][14]; support services (health services, accommodation, crisis care) and prevention (health promotion, cultural initiatives, supply reduction) [4,15,16]. Regardless of the strategy, access to Aboriginal community-controlled health services is vital to an Aboriginal person's right to selfdetermination [13,17], even if some Aboriginal patients prefer to access non-Aboriginal-specific services [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%