2017
DOI: 10.1080/09692290.2017.1302490
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can foreign aid donors credibly threaten to suspend aid? Evidence from a cross-national survey of donor officials

Abstract: Under what conditions are foreign aid donors willing to suspend foreign aid to punish political transgressions, such as election fraud, corruption scandals or political repression? Prior scholarship has emphasized that political sanctions, including foreign aid suspensions, are constrained by the geostrategic considerations of donor countries. However, foreign aid suspensions often occur in strategically important countries, and donors respond differently to different types of political transgressions within t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2.Gulrajani 2017, 375. Recent works to bring serious empirical study of organization to bear on foreign aid include Buntaine 2016; Buntaine, Parks, and Buch 2017; Bush 2015; Swedlund 2017. On the “bureaucratic turn” in IO more generally I have in mind, for example, Johns 2007; Johnson and Urpelainen 2014.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.Gulrajani 2017, 375. Recent works to bring serious empirical study of organization to bear on foreign aid include Buntaine 2016; Buntaine, Parks, and Buch 2017; Bush 2015; Swedlund 2017. On the “bureaucratic turn” in IO more generally I have in mind, for example, Johns 2007; Johnson and Urpelainen 2014.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in order to elicit truthful responses about the conditions under which donors are willing to suspend foreign aid, Swedlund devised a list experiment, which she embedded into her survey. Combined with additional survey data, the list experiment allowed to test key hypotheses on the willingness of donor agencies to enforce political conditionality (Swedlund, 2017a). Testing these hypotheses would not have been possible without directly querying elites, and the experimental approach helped limit concerns about social desirability bias.…”
Section: Facilitating Theory Testing On An Essential Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this literature focuses almost exclusively on supply-side motivations, recipient countries' needs and/or strategic importance to potential donors. A few exceptions consider the demands and/or interactions with recipient state governments -who are largely presented as unitary actors (Swedlund, 2017a(Swedlund, , 2017b.…”
Section: Constituency Agency and Subnational Aid Allocation: Theoretimentioning
confidence: 99%