2022
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.106.l121501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can general relativity play a role in galactic dynamics?

Abstract: We use the gravitoelectromagnetic approach to the solutions of Einstein's equations in the weakfield and slow-motion approximation to investigate the impact of General Relativity on galactic dynamics. In particular, we focus on a particular class of the solutions for the gravitomagnetic field, and show that, contrary to what is expected, they may introduce non negligible corrections to the Newtonian velocity profile. The origin and the interpretation of these corrections are discussed and explicit applications… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
37
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
3
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A somewhat different but related approach, which takes into account the gravitomagnetic effects originating from mass currents into the solution of Einstein equations in weak-field and slow-motion approximation was put forward by Ludwig [218], Ruggiero et al [219], Srivastava et al [220] and analyzed with detailed criticism by Ciotti [221]. In Astesiano and Ruggiero [222], the GR results of these papers are shown to be related to the existence of the homogeneous solutions of the gravitomagnetic field and not directly related to the mass currents. These homogeneous solutions can produce a 'strong gravitomagnetic limit' where these effects are of the same order as Newtonian ones.…”
Section: Galactic Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A somewhat different but related approach, which takes into account the gravitomagnetic effects originating from mass currents into the solution of Einstein equations in weak-field and slow-motion approximation was put forward by Ludwig [218], Ruggiero et al [219], Srivastava et al [220] and analyzed with detailed criticism by Ciotti [221]. In Astesiano and Ruggiero [222], the GR results of these papers are shown to be related to the existence of the homogeneous solutions of the gravitomagnetic field and not directly related to the mass currents. These homogeneous solutions can produce a 'strong gravitomagnetic limit' where these effects are of the same order as Newtonian ones.…”
Section: Galactic Dynamicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These include gravitoelectric flux confinement arising from graviton selfinteraction [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18], non-linear GR effects arising even in the weak-gravity regime [19] and, most recently, gravitomagnetic effects in linearised GR [20]. Certain elements of [20] are further developed in [21] where (although the dark matter paradigm is not directly challenged) significant gravitomagnetic corrections to the rotation curve of a toy-model galactic baryon profile are suggested. An immediate question regarding such claims is how such significant behaviours can have been consistently missed in the long history of numerical relativity [22,23], or in the well-developed post-Newtonian formalism [24,25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps unsurprisingly therefore, the claims in [11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18] and [19] have been subsequently shown to be non-viable in [26] and [27], respectively. The purpose of this paper is to perform the same function for the claims in [20,21], by showing that gravitomagnetism in the form used therein cannot be a significant factor in explaining flat or rising galaxy rotation curves without dark matter.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Different attempts and detailed analyses based on a variety of empirical models for the visible mass distributions of specific galaxies, without including any other invisible or dark matter contribution but rather by accounting for the gravito-magnetic effects sourced by visible mass currents, have been contributed over the years in a number of publications, such as Refs. [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36] (and references therein). However, these authors come to dissimilar conclusionssome (strongly) supporting the possibility, while others being not (at all) as convinced, and some others still even discouraged of pursuing such an avenue-, depending on the models being used for visible matter distributions and their dynamics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%