2006
DOI: 10.5840/faithphil200623329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can God Be Hidden and Evident at the Same Time? Some Kierkegaardian Reflections

Abstract: has argued that a loving God would make his reality evident to all who want to have a relation with God, but that God seems hidden to many such people. One response to this claim, suggested by Kierkegaard, is that God's reality is not really hidden to anyone except those who blind themselves to God's reality. This might seem to imply that all atheism is culpable, but it does not, since some of Kierkegaard's claims imply that those who may think of themselves as atheists may actually have an awareness of God's … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to realize that while, as finite, embodied, human beings , we can't say everything about God, as Christians (or Jews, or Muslims, etc .) we should affirm that we can say something . Erring too far in the one direction leads to arrogance, but erring too far in the other direction leads to vacuity; both are extremes that ought to be avoided.…”
Section: Alterity As a Fundamental Philosophical Categorymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…It is important to realize that while, as finite, embodied, human beings , we can't say everything about God, as Christians (or Jews, or Muslims, etc .) we should affirm that we can say something . Erring too far in the one direction leads to arrogance, but erring too far in the other direction leads to vacuity; both are extremes that ought to be avoided.…”
Section: Alterity As a Fundamental Philosophical Categorymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In fact, Evans claims that reason can both support faith and be transformed by it. For one who attains faith’s “spiritual sensitivity” (or the proper “eyes to see or ears to hear”), even belief in something as divisive and seemingly far‐fetched as God’s existence can be rational and justified (Evans 1998, 90; 2006b, 243). 2 Evans is opposed by the likes of Hannay (1982, 106‐8), Pojman (1984, 24, 100‐2, 136), Garelick (1965, 28‐9), Penelhum (1983, 75‐84, 114‐5), and MacIntyre (1984, 39‐47), just to name a few.…”
Section: Two Responses To Irrationalismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Views that have been influenced at key points by the work of famed philosopher of religion and modern‐day Christian apologist, Alvin Plantinga (e.g. Evans 1992, 111‐2, 180‐1; 1998, 41‐7; 2006b, 243). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2.See for instance Aijaz and Weidler (2007), Dumsday (2010a; 2010b), Evans (2006), Henry (2001; 2008), Howard-Snyder (1996), McKim (2001), Moser (2008), Murray (2002), Oakes (2008), Poston and Dougherty (2007), Rea (2009), Swinburne (1998; 2004), van Inwagen (2006), and Tucker (2008). …”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%