2017
DOI: 10.4236/ojas.2017.72018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Greater Flamingo Recognize Fertile <i>vs.</i> Infertile Egg? A Single Case Study

Abstract: Fertility of captive flamingos varies between flocks, species and seasons. Individuating infertile eggs could be helpful to facilitate important decisions. Wild animals could be encouraged to abandon the nest or not, whereas in captivity removing non-viable egg would lead birds to lay a new one. The aim of this study was to investigate the parental behaviour of a pair of greater flamingos (Phoenicopterus roseus) in the presence of a fertile and an infertile egg. Data on the posture and behaviours of the pair o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 8 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistical significance was set at alpha = 0.05. Mann–Whitney tests were run to compare the duration of each location (near the nest, no nest), posture and behaviour between the females of each pair ( Scarpazza et al, 2016 ; Sandri et al, 2017a ) and to compare the time (%) spent in different locations and postures of females in same-sex pairs with those of greater flamingos involved in heterosexual pairs described in previous research on this flock ( Fig. 1 ) ( Sandri et al, 2017b ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical significance was set at alpha = 0.05. Mann–Whitney tests were run to compare the duration of each location (near the nest, no nest), posture and behaviour between the females of each pair ( Scarpazza et al, 2016 ; Sandri et al, 2017a ) and to compare the time (%) spent in different locations and postures of females in same-sex pairs with those of greater flamingos involved in heterosexual pairs described in previous research on this flock ( Fig. 1 ) ( Sandri et al, 2017b ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%