2002
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.323223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Can Groups be Trusted? An Experimental Study of Collective Trust

Abstract: Several previous studies measure the extent to which individuals trust other individuals and argue that individual trust is an important element of interaction in organizations and markets. However, a related topic is the extent to which it is possible for individuals to trust groups as separate entities. This concept, referred to as collective trust, has been previously discussed but not carefully demonstrated. We conduct experiments that specifically address the question of whether it is possible for individ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 The few studies in economics that consider features of the target of trust are consistent with our contention of its importance, though none highlights the general importance of target-specificity for the measurement of trust to the extent we do here. Specifically, studies explore how trust varies based on target characteristics such as attractiveness (Eckel and Wilson, 2006;Scharlemann et al, 2001), "social distance" from the trustor (Buchan et al, 2002;, ethnic origin (Fershtman and Gneezy, 2001), and on whether the target is an individual or group (Kugler et al, 2007;McEvily et al, 2006). None of these studies explores how behavioral and attitudinal measures are related when accounting for the target of trust, as we do here.…”
Section: Identifying the Target Of Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The few studies in economics that consider features of the target of trust are consistent with our contention of its importance, though none highlights the general importance of target-specificity for the measurement of trust to the extent we do here. Specifically, studies explore how trust varies based on target characteristics such as attractiveness (Eckel and Wilson, 2006;Scharlemann et al, 2001), "social distance" from the trustor (Buchan et al, 2002;, ethnic origin (Fershtman and Gneezy, 2001), and on whether the target is an individual or group (Kugler et al, 2007;McEvily et al, 2006). None of these studies explores how behavioral and attitudinal measures are related when accounting for the target of trust, as we do here.…”
Section: Identifying the Target Of Trustmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their findings tend to indicate that groups are less trusting than individuals, but that they are just as trustworthy. McEvily et al (2006) find that subjects transfer a perception of trustworthiness, which they gained from an interaction with a group, to each of its individual members (see also Kramer et al, 1996;Buchan et al, 2002).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Glaeser et al (2000), for instance, raise doubts on the validity of the World Values Survey trust question (which is similar to the one we use), by showing that it is not correlated with the sender behavior in the standard trust game (Berg et al, 1995). Sapienza et al 2007 , McEvily et al, 2006;Guiso, Sapienza, and Zingales, 2004). This is different from personalized trust, the mutual trust people developed through repeated interactions (Greif, 1993), which is more important in relational contracts.…”
Section: Bilateral Trust a Measuring Trustmentioning
confidence: 82%